Kamala Harris Says that Christine Blasey Ford Should Not Be Bullied’ into Testifying

Tags

Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey Ford, Kamala Harris, politcal weaponization of sexual assault, Resistance movement, Smear Campaign, war on men

Marxist loon, Senator Kamala Harris is trying to eliminate Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s right to due process.

Harris, in an attempt to derail Judge Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation vote says that Christine Blasey Ford who has accused Judge Kavanaugh of attempted sexual assault in spite of the fact that she can’t remember the date, year, location, etc. surrounding the alleged assault should not be forced, correction bullied into testifying.

In other words, Judge Kavanaugh who is by law, innocent until proven guilty, because he is a (white) male.  Therefore, he has no right to due process since allegations of a sexual assault purported to have occurred thirty-six years ago, details of which continues to evolve are levied by a woman who is a Democratic operative must be taken as face value.

Ford is refusing to testify until after an FBI investigation.

Breitbart News by Tony Lee

…“I support Dr. Blasey Ford’s request for an FBI background investigation before a hearing. She should not be bullied into participating in a biased process and we should not rush forward before facts are gathered,” tweeted Harris, who sits on the Judiciary Committee.

I support Dr. Blasey Ford’s request for an FBI background investigation before a hearing. She should not be bullied into participating in a biased process and we should not rush forward before facts are gathered.

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 19, 2018

 

Ford’s lawyers sent a Tuesday evening letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) indicating that Ford will not testify before an FBI investigation into her allegations. In the letter, Ford’s attorneys wrote that “a full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the Committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions….”

The Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee must not allow Communists to further delay the Kavanaugh confirmation vote.  The only voices that we here are coming from women on the left, an intended strategy to strike fear into the the men on the Committee.

“…We would welcome the opportunity to talk with you and Ranking Member Feinstein to discuss reasonable steps as to how Dr. Ford can cooperate while also taking care of her own health and security,” the letter continued[…]

Continue Reading

Bring the most qualified and toughest women attorneys in the Republican Party (no RINOS, that means Lisa Murkowski) into the picture to take these bitches on. Just do it because the left is confident that the Republican leadership will not.

pic.twitter.com/oUOvqHFl3W

— James (@DiaramJames) September 19, 2018

Finally, since Progressives are always playing the long game, we must be mindful that if this former attorney genera/prosecutor and comrades plotting to eliminate the U. S. Constitution by 2020 are successful,  what are the odds of a precedent being set that would eliminate the accused all rights to due process going forward nationwide? (Thinking out loud.)

P.S.  If successful, Kamala Harris would try to ride this moment to the White House in 2020.

Words

Tags

law, newspeak, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Progressives, redefining words, reframing, war on men

Unified Patriots by Bob Montgomery

I received a notice from the local court system recently ordering me to appear at a specified date and time for jury duty. So when the time rolled around I hobbled my aged self to the courthouse, signed in and waited with the other prospective jurors for the bailiff to usher us in. I had no idea whether the trial was civil or criminal or any other details. But upon entering, I observed a defense attorney with a young man in his twenties or thirties at the defense table. After a pep talk by the judge, we were treated to the prosecutor’s remarks about the charge and some things for the jurors to consider as the selection process went along.

It was then that I learned that this was a domestic battery case. The words that came out of the prosecutor’s mouth as she cited the charge against the defendant almost caused me to fall out of my seat. I sat there stunned, thinking surely I must have heard that wrong, or out of context. But a few minutes later she repeated those words and I just started shaking my head rapidly back and forth. The first group of prospective jurors the prosecutor was addressing were off to one side, so she could not see me, nor could the defense attorney. But the judge was looking straight at me.

Ultimately, they obtained a panel of jurors from the first group and I was not called upon. But had I been, I had made up my mind that I was going to speak my mind, and not about the mundane topics of “Can you be fair and impartial” and “Have you ever been in a situation, blah, blah, blah” and all that. I would have been immediately excused. Looking back, I wish I had raised my hand during her initial diatribe and asked if I had heard right and proceeded from there. But I didn’t. I blew it. I had a golden opportunity, but I was a good little citizen and dutifully filed out of the courtroom with the others who were dismissed with the thanks of the court for showing up.

Upon returning home I was still shaking my head in disbelief at what I had heard. So I went to my trusty computer and looked up the domestic battery statute. I used Google because it’s faster than going to the library and checking out the code book and wading through all that. Just typed in the search terms and one of the first entries was that my state’s domestic battery statute had been revised in 2016. So I clicked on it and got an article with the revisions highlighted, followed by the actual text of the statute. The first line of the statute was almost verbatim of what the prosecutor had said in court.
It follows:

“35-42-2-1.3. Domestic battery.
 (a) Except as provided in subsections (b) through (f), a person who knowingly or intentionally:
o (1) touches a family or household member in a rude, insolent, or angry manner; or….”

Did any of that make an impression on you? Here it is again:

“35-42-2-1.3. Domestic battery.
 (a) Except as provided in subsections (b) through (f), a person who knowingly or intentionally:
o (1) touches a family or household member in a rude, insolent, or angry manner; or….”

The title of the statute is “Domestic Battery”. B-A-T-T-E-R-Y.” The offense mentioned above is a Class A Misdemeanor and can result in imprisonment for up to one year. The continuing sections of the statute progress from Level 1 through Level 6 Felonies, as the evidence of injury and the ages of the perpetrator and the ….victim….are brought to bear[…]

Continue Reading
 

Paid Accusers Have To Be Believed!

Tags

allegations of sexual misconduct, fake Russia/Trump investigation, Gloria Allred, Grievance industry, Lisa Bloom, Progressives war on America, Progressives War on Donald Trump, war on men

Unified Patriots by Bob Montgomery

Paid accusers have to be believed!

Lisa Bloom and her mother Gloria Allred got them some sweet gigs going, don’t they? Solicit “donor” funding and round up “accusers”, take your cut and get more media exposure. Wonder if Jeb! will be presenting the Allred girls Liberty Medals like he did Hillary?

Is this what Peter Strzok meant when he told Lisa Page and Andrew McCabe they needed some kind of insurance policy against Trump?

…

Continue Reading