Racist SPLC claims “Drain the Swamp” meme is racist.

Tags

Donald Trump, drain the swamp, labels, Smear Campaign, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, Trump supporters

“Drain the swamp.”  Just do it!

Progressives are digging themselves in deep as in keep digging that hole, man, keep digging that hole.

In one of the latest instances is Ryan Lenz, senior editor of the Southern Poverty Law Center who is now claiming that the phrase “drain the swamp” is racist because so-called white nationalists aka also labeled the “alt-right” now use the term.

See video below:

“So we have a little bit of a two-sided message here.  Yeah, he’s saying stop, but he’s also, you know, giving a wink-wink, nod-nod to the very people he’s asking to step away from their violence.”

CNN’s John Berman pushed back with, “We should note, different phrases can mean different things to different people.”

Really Berman?  Is that the best you could do?  Grow a set, buddy.  Berman should have leaned harder on this SPLC propagandist over bogus claims made and the obvious double standard that SPLC is applying here.

Where was the SPLC in 2007 when Nancy Pelosi said:

“…Today, we will shine a bright light on the linkage between lobbyists and legislators, with legislation that requires an unprecedented level of disclosure.

And in so doing, we keep our promise to drain the swamp that is Washington, D.C., to let sunshine disinfect the Congress.  We have promised the highest ethical standard, and we will deliver it, in an open and honest government.”

Source: Pelosi: ‘With Passage of Lobby Reform, We Draw Back the Curtains, Throw Up the Windows, and Let the Sunshine In’ – Nancy Pelosi, Democratic Leader (Press Release 07/31/2007)

Of course, then Speaker Pelosi and U. S. Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, went on to infest the swamp even further while covering up endless scandals.  Lobby reform only meant reformation on paper, soundbites and in name only because what followed was the doubling down of an already infested swamp.

The SPLC had no objection to Pelosi’s use of the phrase in 2007 nor did they object when former 2016 Republican Party primary candidate, Dr. Ben Carson used the phrase in an ad last year.  See video below:

In his message to the nation Monday night via YouTube, President-Elect, Donald J. Trump, Trump laid out a few of his plans for the first 100 days, one of which was ethic reform (02:05 of video below).

As part of our plan to drain the swamp, we will impose a five-year ban on executive officials becoming lobbyists after they leave the administration — and a lifetime ban on executive officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.

Nothing racist there which leads me to suspect that the 24/7 parsing of the President-Elect’s every word, linking him to so-called white nationalists who like them or not are entitled to free speech and to support the candidate of choice, I accuse Progressives of deflecting as Hillary Clinton did the past 16 months[i].

Finally, Progressives have prospered and skated along for decades by accusing others of racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, etc. They won elections by labeling and silencing their opposition which such terms and so we now have the “alt-right.”  [See Vassar Bushmill’s, “Right and Alt-Right (a worthy read).”

The 2016 election may very well be the first election in which Progressives lost an election partly based on the very labels and attacks that they refuse to give up on.

While Progressives are wholly invested in the ditch that they continue to dig for others and into which they themselves have fallen, the voters are no longer listening.

Case in point: Everyone in my family except moi are card carrying Democrats and while they did not vote in the 2016 presidential election, by the fourth week of October, they and their friends were themselves using the phrase, “drain the swamp.”

Finally, while many neo-Nazis and KKK members are Democrats and some not, my son and his Democratic buddies are neither.

======================

[i]             Voters should remain vigilant.  Keep an eye on the man (George Soros) behind the curtain-

(a) Hillary Clinton conceded, but did she?

(b) Votes are still being counted or stuffed

(c) Democratic electors are staging a coup (in the works) for next month’s Electoral College votes while their comrades in the media, Congress and Senate distract the nation will allegations of racism, homophobia, Islamophobia, etc.

(d) At the same, time during a telephone conference this week, the Clinton campaign is being urged to demand a recount in some states, of which ballots continue to be counted.

Cross-posted on Wow! Magazine.

H/t Conservative Treehouse.

Oops! SPLC Exposes “Anti-Indian Movement” — Led by Indian

Tags

Agenda 21, American Indians, bigotry, Grievance industry, native americans, Scam, SPLC

 

Priceless! Bigots who accuse everyone else of bigotry exposing themselves as the elephant in the room. Ah hem, I stand corrected, bigot in the room trolling for a pay day.

The New American by Alex Newman

The far-left Southern Poverty Law Center thinks a whole race of people, American Indians, are “weak.” In a bizarre rant laced with multiple factual errors, the increasingly discredited group also theorizes about and purports to expose a vast “anti-Indian” conspiracy. But it strategically omits what is arguably the story’s most important fact: The target of the SPLC’s vitriol is actually an American Indian herself, married to a direct descendant of Sacajawea. Oops!

The fact that the SPLC was targeting an Indian could not have escaped the attention of the entity, long denounced as an “anti-Christian hate group” by prominent Christian and conservative organizations. That means that the outfit, which styles itself a “civil-rights” group despite being lambasted as a money-making scam by actual civil-rights leaders, was deliberately deceiving readers of its “Intelligence Report.” This is the same pseudo-“intelligence” that the radical group uses in its efforts to deceive gullible law-enforcement officials across America into viewing mainstream Americans as “extreme.”

The latest SPLC screed, written by Ryan Lenz and published online this week, blasts imaginary “anti-Indian activists” over their concerns about deeply controversial programs such as United Nations Agenda 21. To understand just how controversial this UN “sustainability” scheme is, it is worth mentioning that the state legislature in Alabama, where the SPLC’s widely ridiculed “Poverty Palace” headquarters is located, voted to ban Agenda 21 in a bi-partisan law supported by every elected representative, including all Democrats. By definition, that puts the SPLC’s views radically outside the mainstream…..

Continue…..

Two Charts That Tell You All You Need to Know About IslamoFAUXbia

Tags

Anti-Semitism, Bias, double standards, FBI, hate crimes, Muslims, SPLC, USA

 

Oops, statistics, as stated above, produced by the SPLC (of all organizations) prove that Muslims ARE NOT the primary victims of religious hate crimes in the United States. Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett are not going to be happy with the truth ONCE AGAIN disproving the narrative of propagandists.

Independent Sentinel by S. Noble

Are you afraid to say “radical Islam” like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton? Will you refrain from saying something if you see something if it’s aimed at a Muslim?

Then you might have Islamaphobia phobia. That is the fear of becoming Islamophobic, an illness discovered by Greg Gutfeld of Fox News.

If you see a clock that looks like a bomb and report it, you might get sued for $15 million but, hey, you said something. If you say something about a Muslim that could be misconstrued, Loretta Lynch will be right there waiting to prosecute you for hate speech.

The president and Loretta Lynch are far more concerned about attacks on Muslims increasing than ISIS attacks so it must be a major problem, right?

This chart put out by the far, far left Southern Poverty Law Center eliminates any need for discussion. It just brings up one question. When is Loretta Lynch going to prosecute hate crimes against Jews? Why isn’t that her biggest concern?

[…]

Click Here To Read The Rest of: Two Charts That Tell You All You Need to Know About IslamoFAUXbia

Oh, who to believe – the facts or the lies that Obama is reading from his teleprompter.

Southern Poverty Law Center Exposed

Tags

Government corruption, Government coverups, Government War on Individual Constitutional Rights, Govt War on Constitution, Govt's War on America, Liberals, Marxism, obama, Progressives, Progressivism, Propaganda, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, War on America

The Social Contract Press has released a 100 page special report which can be viewed online exposing the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).  The more we dig, the more we find and we now find that the Southern Law Center based on this report, has credibility issues, who knew?

The SPLC, a pitbull for the left, primarily engages in defamation of those who oppose their progressive agenda. Let us also not forget that this organization’s primary use is that of a cash machine for the likes of Morris Dees, who once did work for the KKK and associates.

A quick viewing of the report reveals almost immediately that Dees is one who pimps the race card solely for the purpose of self-enrichment.  A master at manipulation and fundraising, it should be noted that, Morris Dees, rise to fame was based on selling fear, misconceptions and half-truths which encompassed “scaring little old liberals into thinking that Klansmen were lurking under every bed and bed sheet, and then pitching them for money.” Sound familiar?

This very lucrative yet distasteful tactic worked well into the 90’s for Dees and associates, long after it had become clear that the KKK was no longer a threat.

Then, of course, there is the history of questionable activities by the SPLC.

Fighting Hate for Profit and Power

“After the SPLC set up operation in Montgomery, Alabama, it had a friendly relationship with the staff of the local newspaper The Montgomery Advertiser.‘We parroted their press releases,’ said Jim Tharp, the editor of the Advertiser. In time, however, Tharpe and others found that ‘things were amiss’ at the SPLC, which led to an investigative series of articles.³ The Advertiser’s research found that the SPLC had amassed a huge amount of money using, in some cases, what Tharpe described as ‘questionable fundraising tactics.’⁴

‘There was another problem,’ said Tharpe, ‘with black employees at what was the nation’s richest civil rights organization…. Twelve out of 13 black current and former employees we contacted cited racism at the center, which was a shocker to me.’⁵ Perhaps Dees’ conversion from Klan shystering to civil rights wasn’t as complete as he had led people to believe.

Despite the SPLC’s ‘questionable’ activities, many news outlets report its press releases, particularly about the numbers of alleged ‘hate groups,’ as if they were gospel. One who doesn’t share this faith is Laird Wilcox, a respected researcher of left and right extremist groups. As a veteran of the civil rights movement and a member of the ACLU, one can’t easily dismiss him as a right-wing apologist.

Commenting on an incident where the SPLC claimed that a town in Kansas harbored a ‘hate group’ of Klansmen, because someone rented a post office box there for a bogus Klan group, Wilcox observed,

This was pure disinformation and an example of the terrible things the SPLC does in the campaign to keep the money rolling in from frightening liberals and blacks. Several years ago with minimal effort I went through a list of 800-plus ‘hate groups’ published by the SPLC and determined that over half of them were either non-existent, existed in name only, or were inactive.⁶

Confirming Wilcox’s assessment are those fairly rare occasions when reporters, instead of taking SPLC claims at face value, actually research them. In 2002, the Cleveland Scene did an investigative report on the claim published by the Cleveland Plain Dealer that Ohio had become a ‘stomping ground’ of hate groups. It cited an estimate of 73 groups by the Center for New Community and 40 groups by the SPLC.

The Cleveland Scene concluded that, ‘while a few groups on the monitors’ lists warrant attention, most have dissolved or amount to little more than a guy with a copy of Mein Kampf and a yahoo! account.’ The report quoted Ted Almay, the superintendent of Ohio’s Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation, who said, “I don’t think there are 73 people in Ohio, let alone 73 groups.’^7”

Money is not the only thing that drives the SPLC.  The SPLC is also a Marxist organization whose primary goal besides making money is to bring down the “radical right” while advancing their agenda.

The following is a video of a discussion between Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly and SPLC’s Mark Potok wherein Potok attempts to justify his fear mongering of right wing organizations.

Attacking the Tea Party and the Oath Keepers must look well in the SPLC’s mailings when trolling for donations. Of course, when approached Potok backs off of his accusations that the Oath Keepers are members of a white supremacist organization.

Mark Potok is a Marxist jackass.  The SPLC has declared war on anyone who opposes their agenda and that includes those who oppose illegal immigration.

“Mark Potok vowed ‘to destroy, completely destroy them’—an odd goal indeed for an organization dedicated, in its own words, to ‘teaching tolerance.’⁹ This scorched earth rhetoric recalls the propaganda strategy of Soviet dictator I.V Lenin: ‘We …must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion [and] scorn … toward those who disagree with us.’ Perhaps Mr. Potok knows something of that Soviet leader. He once did a congenial interview with the Socialist Workers Party, which, on its website, endorses the goals of Marx and Lenin.¹⁰

ENDNOTES

3. 1999 Watchdog Journalism Conference sponsored by the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

6. The New American, More on the SPLC, April 12, 2005, William Norman Grigg.

7. Cleveland Scene, White Power Outage, March 3, 2002.”

8. Rutland Herald, June 12, 2007, Gordon Dritschilo.

9. Mark Potok Speech One: Google: Mark Potok Speech One Completely Destroy Michigan youtube.”

I am not even scratching upon the surface of this report, which is a fascinating read, suggest you check it out.  H/t Christian Newswire.