~ “I hope we once again have reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts.” Ronald Reagan.
Several recent studies have revealed the increased number of public school and college students who are experiencing various forms of mental illness, such as depression, anxiety, attention deficit disorder, and others. A Wall Street Journal report claims as many as 25 percent in elite colleges are thus classified, and require accommodations for exam taking, seating preference, quiet private rooms, and comfort animals. Steve Schlozman and Eliza Abdu-Glass, authors of The College Mental Health Crisis: Focus on Suicide, disclosed the thousands of suicides on college campuses each year, about two to three every day. Their emphasis is on students’ inadequate counseling, but we should ask why this generation, specifically, is so unstable and why the obvious signs have been ignored.
Is it possible to identify what could be so threatening?
Our educational system was restructured according to a radical, global, political ideology (Agenda 21) promoted by President Obama’s White House, Bill and Melinda Gates, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, the Governors Association, and other supporters of a federal takeover of education for a Global Economy. Called the Common Core Standards, it was implemented by 46 states and D.C. While we were deluged with Hillary Clinton’s oft-uttered phrase, “no child left behind,” David Coleman, the architect of the controversial, experimental (experimenting on our children!) curriculum, was executing an equal-outcome system, thereby eliminating the motivation and ambition of equal opportunity for individual excellence and achievement, each to his/her own interests and abilities. And, since all schools – public, private, parochial, home schools – were subject to the same textbooks and tests, and the governors handsomely rewarded, the Standards were assumed almost nationwide.
Result: the students have become guinea pigs to a seemingly untested Standard – with a specific purpose[…]
“But Kennedy also stressed the importance of gay rights while noting that litigation on similar issues is likely to continue in lower courts.
“Our society has come to the recognition that gay persons and gay couples cannot be treated as social outcasts or as inferior in dignity and worth,” Kennedy wrote.”
My questions to Justice Kennedy in re his official use of his time, our money and our constitution, would be these: A. “..the importance of gay rights” means important to whom, exactly?; and B. exactly who is it who cannot treat “gay persons and gay couples as social outcasts or as inferior in dignity and worth”?
As I say, I am not your ace constitutional scholar, but I have been under the impression for many, many years that the limitations on freedom of both thought and deed expressed in the Constitution, particularly in the Bill of Rights, were limitations on the government and it’s officers. In other words, if the lawmakers decided that a certain group or class were not to be discriminated against, it was the Government who couldn’t discriminate against them, and those entities explicitly enumerated and in what matters, while preserving their own Constitutional rights as enumerated.
I also thought that freedom of speech, as mentioned in the First Amendment, included all forms of expression, even what Anthony Kennedy’s “Our society” viewed as negative ones.
Further, what “rights” do gays have that Anthony Kennedy thinks are so important? If they have Constitutional rights as individuals, they are already protected by statute and by the Constitution itself, but as far as I know, not as a class. In other words, Congress has not yet passed a law specifying “sexual orientation” as one of the “protected classes’” which the Supreme Court must “protect”, as they say[…]
Tomorrow (April 23rd), parents in cities across the United States, including Charlotte, North Carolina, Austin, Texas, in Canada, Australia and London, England are engaging in a Sex Ed Sit Out.
Protesting the Perversion & Mis-Education of Our Children
Parents will keep their children out of school Monday in protest of Planned Parenthood’s involvement and its unsavory pro-sex agenda pushed in public schools across the nation. Homosexuality, anal and oral sex, how to “masturbate one another, and question their gender,” none of which has any place in the educational system, plays a major role in the push for social justice and all of which now takes precedence in public schools over the Three R’s and history.
[SIDEBAR: About the Three R’s, social justice have replaced teaching our children reading writing and arithmetic which has been moved to the back burner. Cursive writing is non-existent and the history that is being taught in our schools presents a skewed view of America, our Founding Fathers, and the rule of law. Lessons teaching the Bill of Rights is practically non-existent and when taught, what is being pushed as the Bill of Rights is historically incorrect. END OF SIDEBAR]
…Some government schools, supported by the U.S. taxpayer, allow Planned Parenthood into schools through a “sex-ed” program called “Get Real,” for example.
Why more Christian parents aren’t outraged about this is a mystery, but it’s encouraging to know some parents are taking action[…]
Earlier this week, the NFL rejected a full-page ad by veterans organization, AMVETS which displayed soldiers holding the flag and containing the words, “Please stand.”
As reported by ESPN, the NFL asked AMVETS to change the language of the ad to something more appeasing such as, “Please Honor our Veterans” or “Please Stand for our Veterans.” The talking points is that the NFL and AMVETS could not come to a meeting of the minds. [See my post at Wow! Magazine entitled, “Outrage after NFL rejects AMVETS Super Bowl ad.”
Thus, the NFL rejected the ad which just so happened to coincide with the NFL’s announcement that it was going full-fledged social justice at this year’s Super Bowl on February 4, 2018.
ESPN reported Monday that the NFL during this year’s Super Bowl will shove social justice down the throats of football fans (my emphasis) by introducing and publicizing it’s “Let’s Listen Together” initiative not to be confused with Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move.”
The Communist initiative is a partnership between the NFL and players/SJWs on what else? Social justice issues.
Supposedly, the initiative was several years in the making (not buying it) during which NFL team owners is alleged to have earmarked $89 million over a seven-year period for the initiative.
The effort is a product of months of discussions between commissioner Roger Goodell and a group of players led by Philadelphia Eagles safety Malcolm Jenkins and retired receiver Anquan Boldin…
Well then, the initiative was not several years in the making as the NFL claims.
“The collaboration between the NFL and its players should be celebrated, as it’s the first professional league or entity that has taken the concerns of its players and put resources behind it,” Boldin said in a statement. “Our country has some real issues when it comes to social and racial equality that must be addressed. The only way these issues will get solved is to fight together.”
Said Goodell: “We are pleased to have developed a new initiative that focuses on creating meaningful solutions to improve our communities. In developing this plan, we have taken the lead from our players and are honored to join them in this work. Their work has deepened our understanding of the unique platform we have to help advance progress in a profound and unifying way.”
Roger Goodell, the NFL, team owners and players have chosen Communism over our veterans who served their country, fought in wars around the world so that these ungracious, anti-American loons could enjoy freedom of expression, no matter how vulgar.
Such a reality is not lost on Americans further outraged by the NFL’s latest war on free speech and liberty.
While in the United States, Americans have the right to vote, Progressives along with the United Nations Human Rights Council who has no legal jurisdiction over our country or its laws alleges that voter id laws are oppressive and violate the human rights of African Americans.
Hypocritical? A double standard? You betcha but wait there is more…
Even though, “if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan” and “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor” are among the greatest lies ever told (my emphasis), the greatest lie ever told goes to Barack Obama mentor (one of them anyway), Karl Marx, “Proletariat of the world, unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains.”
Marx was speaking about Communism which can only be achieved by the elimination of private property, national, religious, even ethnic identities and capitalism which would eliminate inequality and suffering. The people pushing the latter often do so from their Apple devices while sipping on a cinnamon dolce macchiato from Starbucks and eating fast food, all of which are devices of capitalism.
As for the eradication of inequality and suffering through the elimination of capitalism and private property and businesses, history has proven just well Communism worked under Stalin, Mao and just to name a few, today in Cuba, South Africa and Venezuela. Another aspect of Communism is urban housing to be addressed at a later date.
Eliminating the “Bill of Rights,” ownership of private property, capitalism, national, religious and ethnic identities and replacing it with “class identity,” “collectivism” and “open borders” would open the door wider toward the Communist ruling class and elites having dominion over every aspect of our lives from to the food we eat, to our health and wallets.
Imagine utopia such a nightmare on a global scale. It must be denied; such would explain why the Communist media complex, its pundits and bureaucrats, all Marxist elites are throwing the label “nationalism” around as if one’s love of country is such a horrific act, the revelations of which have been realized by those fighting to exit the European Union.
ID2020 – Government Issued Digital IDs – Communist World Order
As states continue to shove the Real ID down the throats of its citizens under the guise that it’s for their own good (a) hackers continue to spoof these cards/biometric ids in the wallets, pockets, cellphones of the holder and by accessing vulnerable government databases.
Likewise, the United Nations appears to be on schedule as they roll out ID2020 (a) the distribution by nations of government-issued digital identity cards containing the biometrics, legal identity, birth registration, financial data, etc. belonging to the individual; and (b) a database that stores the biometrics, legal identity, birth registration, financial data, etc. belonging to every person on the planet.
Pushing for a cashless society, the implementation of ID2020 in partnership with the donor classes, and entities from UNICEF, the World Bank, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Accenture, The Rockefeller Foundation to Big Pharma and those governments advocating redistribution of wealth and fundamental transformation. (Hint, hint. Sound familiar? No? See below.)
As noted on the ID2020 Alliance website, this is not about the individual but rather how to control and have dominion over the individual by the global elites:
…By coordinating funding for identity and channeling those funds towards high-impact projects, this alliance model enables diverse stakeholders – UN agencies, NGOs, governments, and enterprises – to pursue a coordinated approach and creates a pathway for efficient implementation at scale….
Another reason to defund the UN and every entity connected to ID 2020 Alliance down to the last cent.
…For digital identity to meet the needs of governments, international organizations, businesses and individuals alike, it must be:
Personal: unique to you and only you
Persistent: lives with you from life to death
Portable: accessible anywhere you happen to be
Private: only you can give permission to use or view data
To meet these criteria, an approach based on open standards and open API is critical, facilitating vendor neutrality, ensuring there’s room for continued innovation, and allowing an ecosystem to develop around a framework for technical interoperability. No government, country or organization can solve this challenge alone….
Cutting the Core of Globalists Newspeak
It’s all about control.
The intent of a “universal digital identity,” is to, and if successful will, control every aspect of our lives. It must supersede national identity and sovereignty, most importantly that of Americans in order for the New World Order to achieve its goals thus explaining eight years of Barack Obama’s endless regurgitation of “I am a citizen of the world,” “that’s not who we are” while repeatedly appeasing America’s enemies and expressing his disdain for our nation.
It is interesting to note that only Americans and Europeans are accused of “nationalism” while other nations (dog whistle for non-white) nations are not.
Left out of the discussion is that Americans of every ethnicity and legal immigrants in the USA express their patriotism and love for our country. The sames goes across the pond in Europe where many express their patriotism and love of their countries but that’s “racist” “anti-Islamic” “xenophobic” “not who we are”?
As living in a sanctuary city affords me a front row seat, I have during discussions with or simply observed people from other countries expressing love and pride of their homeland which is NEVER called into question. Yet, in this same sanctuary city, expressing one’s love of country as an American with the exception of September 11, 2001, is shocking to stupid Americans, frowned upon, mocked by many and held in disdain.
My cab driver who jokingly (or so he pretends) states from time to time, “You know you can’t say that in front of other people” is aware that I am an unapologetic and unhyphenated American. He is from Guyana, a proud legal immigrant and while he will say that he is American, I have noticed that he is always a Guyanese first. When he speaks of legal immigrants from Guyana, he says that they are Guyanese and then follows it up with they are here legally.
The short of it: It is fine for a Jamaican, Haitian, Mexican, South American, Nigerian or Arab to embrace nationalism but “racist” “anti-Islamic” “xenophobic” “not who we are” according to spin masters for Americans and Europeans (because someone has decided that they’re all white) to express the same.
Such a load of b.s. Every day, we are witnessing two sets of laws in the United States, one set of laws for illegal immigrants and another for legal immigrants and natural born Americans with natural born Americans being pushed to the rear of the bus as a punishment for being who we are and for our love of country.
The intent is to force Americans to relinquish their identity and spirituality to clear the path for Communism only across the planet.
UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Goal 16.9 – LEGAL ID – ID2020
[Newspeak: The above banner represents UN SDG’s Goal 16. It is reminiscent of AntiFa fascists stomping on the heads of their victims while shouting “Love trumps hate” and insisting that they’re fighting to defeat fascism and Nazism. The banner and those behind it are no more peaceful or seeking peace than AntiFa fascists.]
“The ID2020 Alliance is a global partnership working to address the lack of recognized identity by more than a billion people around the world, in accordance with Target 16.9 of the Sustainable Development Goals.
“Reaching the goal outlined in Target 16.9 of the Sustainable Development Goals is ambitious and will require coherent and coordinated action at the national, regional and global levels. The overall objective of the ID2020 Alliance is to empower individuals, enable economic opportunity, and advance global development by increasing access to digital identity.”
…
“A unique convergence of trends provides an unprecedented opportunity to make a coordinated, concerted push towards the goal of universal digital identity.”
That is the goal of a United Nations-backed organization called ID2020.
Ultimately, the goal of this group is to implement target 16.9 of the 17 goals laid out in the UN’s Sustainable Development. Goal 16.9 reads, “by 2030, [they will] provide legal ID for all, including birth registration.” This is exactly what ID2020 intends to do!
All that and more in this bombshell report…
Additionally, all of us should be outraged by the United Nations who have adopted a global “action plan” demanding a planetary education regime that will brainwash our children into social-justice warriors and sustainability-minded world citizens.
The UN will promote “merged development” of the “whole person” including their beliefs, values, spirituality and lifestyle. Their goal included indoctrinating our youth to understand their responsibilities to “protect the planet,” and promote the UN agenda for the “common good.” Meaning throw personal individuality and freedom out the door and accept the hive mentality of “the good of the whole…”
One final point, as Muslims continue to converge upon Europe (and the United States) in overwhelming numbers, the claim is that these people have no identification to confirm or deny who they are yet the UN “High Commissioner for Refugees” courtesy of Accenture has implemented the use of “biometric technology to identify and track refugees.”
The UNHCR will use Accenture’s Biometric Identity Management System (BIMS) for the endeavor. BIMS can be used to collect facial, iris, and fingerprint biometric data, and will also be used to provide many refugees with their only form of official documentation. The system will work in conjunction with Accenture’s Unique Identity Service Platform (UISP) to send this information back to a central database in Geneva, allowing UNHCR offices all over the world to effectively coordinate with the central UNHCR authority in tracking refugees.
Starting with a pilot project in the Dzaleka Refugee Camp in Malawi, the program has blossomed over the last couple of years to provide services in refugee camps in Thailand and Chad, with over 220,000 people identified in the two countries so far. It’s an ambitious project, but Accenture has experience with large-scale biometric system initiatives, having helped the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Biometric Identity Management with a major border control project, for example. This latest endeavor will see the company’s technology used in important humanitarian efforts – and in fact it seems to have already helped hundreds of thousands.
Think what you will, but it seems to me that since the UNHCR had the ability to track so-called “refugees” on a global scale for a few years now that they know more those than they’re shifting across the planet than they’re letting. Thus, one can only assume that citizens of countries under invasion are intentionally being kept out of the loop by elected bureaucrats.
Another reason to despise Microsoft, as if you needed, it: Windows 10 Features Built-In Biometrics System. The talking points is that it will eliminate the need for passwords via Windows Hello. I hate Windows Hello and have disabled it. Privacy issue? Windows? Hell yes.
Breaking today is the news about Michael Flynn pleading guilty this morning. Progressives are spinning this as the end for President Donald J. Trump but is it really?
And why is it that every time the news stream is full of sins committed by Progressives, so call breaking news from the Mueller camp? Suddenly, everyone is back on the fake Russian hoax again and no one is talking about Matt Lauer, Al Franken or John Conyers? Coincidence?
The primary agenda of the Communist media complex is to Spin! Spin! Spin!
If Republicans FINALLY push through the vote on tax reform this afternoon, how much press will it get? I suspect that the deep state has instructed its puppets to ignore any Trump successes and stick to Russia, Russia, Russia.