Theresa May, the UK’s own swamp critter has betrayed the citizens of the UK who voted for Brexit.
Published on Jul 9, 2018 by Paul Joseph Watson
Brexit has been betrayed, Theresa must go.
A word of advice and plenty of good information below on how to choose your candidates in this year’s mid-term elections. Do not focus on distractions or whom suggests what. Do your homework, America. Make an educated vote and make your vote count. There is much at stake.
Hard Nox & Friends by Uriel
Conservative Voters Be Aware 2018 Is Shaping Up
An up-to-date list of politicians who have so far announced that they plan to retire, tendered resignations or suggested they will, or run for another office in 2018 can be found at Ballotpedia.
According to them, as of 01/07/18 there are:
1. 3 Senate members (all Republican) not seeking re-election
2. 40 representatives not seeking re-election : Democratic 14 and Republican 26
3. Incumbents seeking Senate seat: Democratic 3 and Republican 5
4. House members running for governor: Democratic 4 and Republican 5
5. Incumbents retiring from public office: Democratic 7 and Republican 16
Their list of current congressional seat elections for 2018 can be found HERE. Elections to the U.S. Senate will have a total of 33 of the 100 seats up for regular election. Elections to the U.S. House will be have ALL 435 seats up for election.
Now that we can see a breakdown of numbers leaving or having left by January 2018, let’s move on and consider where the Democrat Party is headed.
First we absolutely know they are foaming at the mouth to replace as many seats as possible with Democrats in both the House and Senate. They are also focused on ALL positions from local to federal and plan to override the conservatives in every aspect of government[…]
Communism, globalism, ID 2020, Illegal Immigration, legal immigrants, National Ids, New World Order, open borders, REAL ID Act, social-justice, UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Goal 16.9, United Nations, United Nations Sustainable Development
According to the ID2020 Alliance, digital identity (cards) is a human right, “Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law” and necessary to access basic services such as “healthcare and education, vote, and access other social assistance programs.”
While in the United States, Americans have the right to vote, Progressives along with the United Nations Human Rights Council who has no legal jurisdiction over our country or its laws alleges that voter id laws are oppressive and violate the human rights of African Americans.
Hypocritical? A double standard? You betcha but wait there is more…
Even though, “if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan” and “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor” are among the greatest lies ever told (my emphasis), the greatest lie ever told goes to Barack Obama mentor (one of them anyway), Karl Marx, “Proletariat of the world, unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains.”
Marx was speaking about Communism which can only be achieved by the elimination of private property, national, religious, even ethnic identities and capitalism which would eliminate inequality and suffering. The people pushing the latter often do so from their Apple devices while sipping on a cinnamon dolce macchiato from Starbucks and eating fast food, all of which are devices of capitalism.
As for the eradication of inequality and suffering through the elimination of capitalism and private property and businesses, history has proven just well Communism worked under Stalin, Mao and just to name a few, today in Cuba, South Africa and Venezuela. Another aspect of Communism is urban housing to be addressed at a later date.
Eliminating the “Bill of Rights,” ownership of private property, capitalism, national, religious and ethnic identities and replacing it with “class identity,” “collectivism” and “open borders” would open the door wider toward the Communist ruling class and elites having dominion over every aspect of our lives from to the food we eat, to our health and wallets.
utopia such a nightmare on a global scale. It must be denied; such would explain why the Communist media complex, its pundits and bureaucrats, all Marxist elites are throwing the label “nationalism” around as if one’s love of country is such a horrific act, the revelations of which have been realized by those fighting to exit the European Union.
As states continue to shove the Real ID down the throats of its citizens under the guise that it’s for their own good (a) hackers continue to spoof these cards/biometric ids in the wallets, pockets, cellphones of the holder and by accessing vulnerable government databases.
Likewise, the United Nations appears to be on schedule as they roll out ID2020 (a) the distribution by nations of government-issued digital identity cards containing the biometrics, legal identity, birth registration, financial data, etc. belonging to the individual; and (b) a database that stores the biometrics, legal identity, birth registration, financial data, etc. belonging to every person on the planet.
Pushing for a cashless society, the implementation of ID2020 in partnership with the donor classes, and entities from UNICEF, the World Bank, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Accenture, The Rockefeller Foundation to Big Pharma and those governments advocating redistribution of wealth and fundamental transformation. (Hint, hint. Sound familiar? No? See below.)
[Image source: ID2020 Alliance]
As noted on the ID2020 Alliance website, this is not about the individual but rather how to control and have dominion over the individual by the global elites:
|…By coordinating funding for identity and channeling those funds towards high-impact projects, this alliance model enables diverse stakeholders – UN agencies, NGOs, governments, and enterprises – to pursue a coordinated approach and creates a pathway for efficient implementation at scale….|
Another reason to defund the UN and every entity connected to ID 2020 Alliance down to the last cent.
…For digital identity to meet the needs of governments, international organizations, businesses and individuals alike, it must be:
To meet these criteria, an approach based on open standards and open API is critical, facilitating vendor neutrality, ensuring there’s room for continued innovation, and allowing an ecosystem to develop around a framework for technical interoperability. No government, country or organization can solve this challenge alone….
The intent of a “universal digital identity,” is to, and if successful will, control every aspect of our lives. It must supersede national identity and sovereignty, most importantly that of Americans in order for the New World Order to achieve its goals thus explaining eight years of Barack Obama’s endless regurgitation of “I am a citizen of the world,” “that’s not who we are” while repeatedly appeasing America’s enemies and expressing his disdain for our nation.
It is interesting to note that only Americans and Europeans are accused of “nationalism” while other nations (dog whistle for non-white) nations are not.
Left out of the discussion is that Americans of every ethnicity and legal immigrants in the USA express their patriotism and love for our country. The sames goes across the pond in Europe where many express their patriotism and love of their countries but that’s “racist” “anti-Islamic” “xenophobic” “not who we are”?
As living in a sanctuary city affords me a front row seat, I have during discussions with or simply observed people from other countries expressing love and pride of their homeland which is NEVER called into question. Yet, in this same sanctuary city, expressing one’s love of country as an American with the exception of September 11, 2001, is shocking to stupid Americans, frowned upon, mocked by many and held in disdain.
My cab driver who jokingly (or so he pretends) states from time to time, “You know you can’t say that in front of other people” is aware that I am an unapologetic and unhyphenated American. He is from Guyana, a proud legal immigrant and while he will say that he is American, I have noticed that he is always a Guyanese first. When he speaks of legal immigrants from Guyana, he says that they are Guyanese and then follows it up with they are here legally.
The short of it: It is fine for a Jamaican, Haitian, Mexican, South American, Nigerian or Arab to embrace nationalism but “racist” “anti-Islamic” “xenophobic” “not who we are” according to spin masters for Americans and Europeans (because someone has decided that they’re all white) to express the same.
Such a load of b.s. Every day, we are witnessing two sets of laws in the United States, one set of laws for illegal immigrants and another for legal immigrants and natural born Americans with natural born Americans being pushed to the rear of the bus as a punishment for being who we are and for our love of country.
The intent is to force Americans to relinquish their identity and spirituality to clear the path for Communism only across the planet.
“16.9 By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration” ~ (Source: UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16 – importance of participatory institutions & policymaking, Foundation for Democracy and Sustainable Development)
[Newspeak: The above banner represents UN SDG’s Goal 16. It is reminiscent of AntiFa fascists stomping on the heads of their victims while shouting “Love trumps hate” and insisting that they’re fighting to defeat fascism and Nazism. The banner and those behind it are no more peaceful or seeking peace than AntiFa fascists.]
by Lisa Haven
“The ID2020 Alliance is a global partnership working to address the lack of recognized identity by more than a billion people around the world, in accordance with Target 16.9 of the Sustainable Development Goals.
“Reaching the goal outlined in Target 16.9 of the Sustainable Development Goals is ambitious and will require coherent and coordinated action at the national, regional and global levels. The overall objective of the ID2020 Alliance is to empower individuals, enable economic opportunity, and advance global development by increasing access to digital identity.”
“A unique convergence of trends provides an unprecedented opportunity to make a coordinated, concerted push towards the goal of universal digital identity.”
That is the goal of a United Nations-backed organization called ID2020.
Ultimately, the goal of this group is to implement target 16.9 of the 17 goals laid out in the UN’s Sustainable Development. Goal 16.9 reads, “by 2030, [they will] provide legal ID for all, including birth registration.” This is exactly what ID2020 intends to do!
All that and more in this bombshell report…
Additionally, all of us should be outraged by the United Nations who have adopted a global “action plan” demanding a planetary education regime that will brainwash our children into social-justice warriors and sustainability-minded world citizens.
The UN will promote “merged development” of the “whole person” including their beliefs, values, spirituality and lifestyle. Their goal included indoctrinating our youth to understand their responsibilities to “protect the planet,” and promote the UN agenda for the “common good.” Meaning throw personal individuality and freedom out the door and accept the hive mentality of “the good of the whole…”
One final point, as Muslims continue to converge upon Europe (and the United States) in overwhelming numbers, the claim is that these people have no identification to confirm or deny who they are yet the UN “High Commissioner for Refugees” courtesy of Accenture has implemented the use of “biometric technology to identify and track refugees.”
The UNHCR will use Accenture’s Biometric Identity Management System (BIMS) for the endeavor. BIMS can be used to collect facial, iris, and fingerprint biometric data, and will also be used to provide many refugees with their only form of official documentation. The system will work in conjunction with Accenture’s Unique Identity Service Platform (UISP) to send this information back to a central database in Geneva, allowing UNHCR offices all over the world to effectively coordinate with the central UNHCR authority in tracking refugees.
Starting with a pilot project in the Dzaleka Refugee Camp in Malawi, the program has blossomed over the last couple of years to provide services in refugee camps in Thailand and Chad, with over 220,000 people identified in the two countries so far. It’s an ambitious project, but Accenture has experience with large-scale biometric system initiatives, having helped the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Biometric Identity Management with a major border control project, for example. This latest endeavor will see the company’s technology used in important humanitarian efforts – and in fact it seems to have already helped hundreds of thousands.
Think what you will, but it seems to me that since the UNHCR had the ability to track so-called “refugees” on a global scale for a few years now that they know more those than they’re shifting across the planet than they’re letting. Thus, one can only assume that citizens of countries under invasion are intentionally being kept out of the loop by elected bureaucrats.
Another reason to despise Microsoft, as if you needed, it: Windows 10 Features Built-In Biometrics System. The talking points is that it will eliminate the need for passwords via Windows Hello. I hate Windows Hello and have disabled it. Privacy issue? Windows? Hell yes.
See also: Blacklisted News article, “What’s ID 2020 And Are You Ready To Become Impacted By It?” and Michael Snyder, Economic Collapse 2015 article, “The UN Plans To Implement Universal Biometric Identification For All Of Humanity By 2030” and “Microsoft And Accenture Aid ID2020 Partnership With Enterprise Ethereum Alliance Permissioned Blockchain Protocol.”
Just in case you were wondering what is up with the federal government’s war on the nation’s police state. Another fundamental transformation and meaning to “we’re the government and we’re to help” to we are of a One World Government and we are here to help based on NWO ideals. No form of dissent will be tolerated.
Activist Post by Brandon Turbeville
In yet another step towards the establishment of a world military force that seeks peace through the absence of dissent, the United States announced its support in May for a set of principles that will allow the United Nations’ peacekeeping troops and UN police to use force in order to “protect civilians” in combat zones and areas of armed conflict.
U.S. Ambassador the U.N. and notorious warmonger against Libya and Syria, Samantha Power stated that the Kigali Principles would “make peacekeeping missions more effective, improve security and save lives.”
“The Kigali Principles are designed to make sure that civilians are not abandoned by the international community again,” said Power
The Kigali Principles call for countries who contribute troops to UN missions to give UN Peacekeeping Commanders the authority to use military force against “armed actors with clear hostile intent to harm civilians” without waiting for approval from the United Nations and its member states.
“If a commander has to wait hours and hours for guidance from capital, it may mean not being able to react in time to repel a fast-approaching attack on a nearby village,” Power added.
The Kigali initiative was introduced by the United States, the Netherlands, and Rwanda in 2015.
According to a report from the Military Times, U.N. peacekeeping forces from the 29 countries signing on to the principles are now required to act if civilians are in danger.
Twenty-nine countries represents less than a third of United Nations members and include:
Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Burkina Faso, Canada, Djibouti, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Germany, Ghana, Guinea, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Malawi, Montenegro, Netherlands, Niger, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Togo, Ukraine, Uganda, United States, Uruguay and Zambia
Notably absent from the list of signatories is Russia, China, Iran, and Lebanon as well as a number of other “anti” NATO countries.
The possibility of United Nations’ forces being used as a wider and seemingly more “official” and credible invading force is very real, especially in places like Syria where, despite all evidence to the contrary, the United States, GCC, the West in general and the United Nations continually harp about “Assad’s crimes against humanity and civilians” while ignoring the crimes of the Western-backed terrorists who have run rampant across the country, displaying a clear institutional bias against states like Syria who operate outside of the totally control of the Anglo-European, Anglo-American banking axis.
Likewise, many civilians may be as worried about the U.N. peacekeepers as they are of their own despotic governments and warlords after a trail of sexual abuse, rapes, assaults, and murders have been left in the U.N’s wake in places like Haiti, Congo, Ivory Coast, Libya, Mali, Sudan, and Central African Republic.
Many are concerned about the growing power of U.N. in domestic national matters, particularly after reports of recent sightings of U.N. vehicles being carried on flatbed trucks began making their rounds on the Internet and alternative media networks. While many “skeptic” organization like Snopes tried to debunk the sightings as mere transport of American-manufactured vehicles to coastal ports (manufactured by BAE), World Net Daily contacted BAE and Aplineco, who denied that the vehicles belonged to their company.
We, the troop and police contributing countries, following the International Conference on the Protection of Civilians held in Kigali, from 28-29 May 2015 under the theme “Protection of Civilians through Peacekeeping: From Mandates Design to Implementation”; bringing together the top 30 troop and police contributing countries, the top ten financial contributing countries and other stakeholders; and after deliberations on how to effectively implement the Protection of Civilians mandates in peacekeeping operations, pledge the following:
1. To train all of our troops on the protection of civilians prior to their deployment to missions.
2. To ensure that our sector and contingent-commanders, as well as our nominees for mission leadership positions, have a high level of training and preparedness on peacekeeping operations and, in particular, the protection of civilians.
3. To be prepared to use force to protect civilians, as necessary and consistent with the mandate. Such action encompasses making a show of force as a deterrent; inter-positioning our forces between armed actors and civilians; and taking direct military action against armed actors with clear hostile intent to harm civilians.
4. Not to stipulate caveats or other restrictions that prevent us from fulfilling our responsibility to protect civilians in accordance with the mandate.
5. To identify and communicate to the UN any resource and capability gaps that inhibit our ability to protect civilians.
6. To strive, within our capabilities, to contribute the enabling capabilities (e.g. helicopters) to peacekeeping operations that facilitate improved civilian protection.
7. To avoid undue delay in protecting civilians, by investing our contingent commander with the authority to use force to protect civilians in urgent situations without the need for further consultations with capital.
8. Not to hesitate to take action to protect civilians, in accordance with the rules of engagement, in the absence of an effective host government response or demonstrated willingness to carry out its responsibilities to protect civilians.
9. To demand clarity from the UN and mission leadership on our rules of engagement, including under which circumstances the use of force is appropriate.
10. To seek to identify, as early as possible, potential threats to civilians and proactively take steps to mitigate such threats and otherwise reduce the vulnerability of the civilian population.
11. To seek to enhance the arrangements for rapid deployment, including by supporting a full review of the UN’s standby arrangements, exploring a system in which earmarked units from troop and police contributing countries could be placed in readiness in order to ensure rapid troop deployment, and encouraging the utilisation of partnerships with regional organisations such as the African Union and its RECs.
12. To be vigilant in monitoring and reporting any human rights abuses or signs of impending violence in the areas in which our personnel serve.
13. To take disciplinary action against our own personnel if and when they fail to act to protect civilians when circumstances warrant such action.
14. To undertake our own review, in parallel to any after-action review, in the event that our personnel are unable to protect civilians, and identify and share key lessons for avoiding such failures in the future.
15. To hold our own personnel to the highest standard of conduct, and to vigorously investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute any incidents of abuse.
16. To better implement protection of civilians mandates and deliver on our responsibilities, we request better, regular and more extensive consultations on the mandating of peacekeeping missions. When mandates of peacekeeping missions are under review and may change, it should also be mandatory for the Security Council to consult all troop and police contributing countries deployed to the mission. We commit to bring our own ideas and solutions to these consultations that can strengthen the implementation of protection of civilians mandates.
17. To urge the Security Council to ensure that mandates are matched with the requisite resources, and to commit to support a process that addresses the current critical resource gaps in several missions. We support a more phased mandating process that can ensure a better alignment of resources and mandates.
18. Noting that any well-planned mandate implementation may be undermined by inefficient mobility, logistics or support; To call for effective support of all military plans, including contingency plans; and to commit to work with the Secretariat to review the current support arrangements, including possible transfer of authority over more of the logistical capability to the military component, where appropriate.
Recommend that these principles be endorsed on a voluntary basis and that the signatories meet once each year to discuss how to further improve the implementation of the Protection of Civilians mandate in UN peacekeeping operations.
Infowars by Paul Joseph Watson
In a column for Foreign Policy Magazine, Council on Foreign Relations member James Traub argues that the elite need to “rise up” against the “mindlessly angry” ignorant masses in order to prevent globalization from being derailed by the populist revolt that led to Brexit and the rise of Donald Trump.
Concerned that, “Today’s citizen revolt — in the United States, Britain, and Europe — may upend politics as nothing else has in my lifetime,” Traub notes that Brexit was an “utter repudiation of….bankers and economists” and an example of how “extremism has gone mainstream”.
Citing the potential for Trump to split the Republican Party even if he loses and the increasing unpopularity of France’s socialist government, Traub argues that establishment political parties in major western countries must “combine forces to keep out the nationalists”[…]
My message to this elitist tub of lard:
It Is the Duty of Every American To Go See ‘Amerigeddon’ The Movie!
AMERIGEDDON’s release in an election year is not coincidental. The film illustrates a dystopian future all patriots must guard against and is a call to action to preserve the Second Amendment and stop executive rule by fiat. Director Mike Norris, son of Chuck Norris, asks for like-minded Americans to support the film.
“The fact that a recent poll showed a majority of Americans are enraged with the federal government points to a frenzy of unrest with the dictatorial way in which our country has been run,” said Norris. “My family has long been involved in protecting the rights of Americans. We are concerned about the future and and see this film as a call to action. We urge people to join us in theaters and show Hollywood and politicians that true patriots will fight for their rights and want to see their values represented on-screen.”
A collaboration between Norris and entrepreneur and writer Gary Heavin, AMERIGEDDON seizes on fact-based threats and asks the ultimate question, “What happens when government turns on the people it’s supposed to protect?”
Executive Producer Gary Heavin believes the film’s message warning is timely….