~ “I hope we once again have reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts.” Ronald Reagan.
San Diego State University Muslim Student Association (image: Facebook)
Radical Muslim extremists much like radical Black extremists are all on a quest to silence all voices of opposition. Either ban them from the campuses or shutter the doors and windows of Progressive universities solely based on their never-ending refusal to do no harm.
…our nation’s universities are increasingly becoming thuggish centers of Leftist indoctrination where opposing views are forcibly silenced. This holds true across the country, from ostensibly Catholic entities such as Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire to secular ones such as San Diego State University.
“Muslim Student Association demands all ‘Islamophobic speech’ be punished,” by Alec Dent, College Fix, December 28, 2015:
‘The Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University is demanding that administrators combat Islamophobia by developing a “zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions.”
The demands, modeled after similar ones issued by black student associations at campuses across the nation[…]
Believe it or not, American soldiers fighting against ISIS in Syria and Iraq will actually be wearing the emblem of ISIS – the infamous crossed-swords logo. Well, almost.
Controversy has stirred because many think the patch looks too much like our boys are fighting for the enemy… just another sign of confusion about the counterproductive Obama-led war against the notorious and shamefully exploitative jihadist army.
‘A combat patch worn by U.S. soldiers who served in Iraq on the mission against Islamic State is drawing flak from service members and veterans who say the patch — with its palm wreath, stars and crossed scimitars — looks like something the enemy would wear.’
‘new U.S. Army patch for fight against the Islamic State closely resembles Muslim Brotherhood logo.’
While the Islamic State is using barbaric tactics to remake the Middle East closer to its own vision of a Caliphate, the United States and its allies also seek to remake the Middle East, and use the specter of terrorism to aid in regime change in Syria and elsewhere.
The triangulation and cross-purposes are both confusing and aggravating to many Americans.
Soldiers in Iraq will soon have a new shoulder sleeve patch to signify their service in the fight against the Islamic State.
All told, there are about 3,335 troops in the region training Iraqi troops, providing security and conducing bombing missions on Islamic State targets in Iraq and neighboring Syria.
The Army’s patch features crossed scimitars, a palm wreath and stars. The scimitars, short swords with curved blades, are meant to symbolize the twin goals of the U.S.-led coalition: to defeat the Islamic State, also referred to as ISIL, and to restore stability in the region, according to Army documents.
Arguably the ‘twin goals’ of Operation Inherent Resolve – better known as the fight against ISIS / ISIL – is fitting with the War on Terrorism in general which always, like a double sword, cut both ways. Symbolically, the double sword cuts both ways, and plays of opposite goals, and embraces conflict, which creates chaos, and begs for a savior and a solution.
But the U.S. has, in fact, created and breathed life into the TV villain known as ISIS. From. the. beginning.
Not to worry America, it’s just the gremlin in the White House standing with his Muslim brethren (sarcasm) and fundamentally destroying our standing along with the greatest military in the world. H/t WND.
Over the national holiday weekend of Labor Day, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) is assembling for its 52nd Annual Convention from 4-7 September 2015 at the Donald E. Stephens Convention Center in Rosemont, Illinois. The Muslim Brotherhood convention’s theme is “Stories of Resilience: Strengthening the American Muslim Narrative.” Per the program and screenshot below from the ISNA website, United States Representative Keith Ellison (Democrat, 5th District, MN) is slated to speak at this key gathering of Muslim Brotherhood affiliates….
One of the Texas jihadists shot and killed while carrying explosives outside of Texas Draw Muhammad Event held by Pamela Geller a few months back was radicalized in Minnesota.
In what has become business as usual in Washington, D.C., it is troublesome that no one questions Ellison’s affiliation with Islamic extremists, many of whom are speakers at the ISNA Convention. See poster below:
YES, while there would be a ‘technical’ changing of the guard – coupled with stylistic differences – in relationship to the global Brotherhood Mafia, well, her ascension would be no less than cementing Islamist power for 4 more years. In effect, after a 12 year period of entrenchment (2008-2020), the United States of America may as well be changed to the Shariah States of America, thus, ending the charade of a Constitutional Republic. As a matter of fact, many confuse the US with being a democracy, but no matter. Either way, its death kneel would be complete.
TO wit, it is under Hill’s (Bill’s alike) crooked wings that Huma Abedin’s Islamist controlover key FED power centers in America has flourished. But before we head to the specifics, it must be understood that for the Bonnie and Clyde couple of US power politics the impetus is two-fold: ideological AND financial. And it is through the criminally constructed Clinton Foundation that much of the nefarious, anti-American activity is funneled, indeed, tailor-made for RICO charges! Alas, some of it will be detailed below via Clinton’s Inc.’s sell-out to the Arabs ala ‘port deals’…patience, dear readers…
BACK to Huma’s ‘pedigree’, and what her re-entry into the White house – having been part of Billy boy’s White (aka frat) House – portends for America. Mind you, this investigative journalist ran with her bonafides, almost as an opening shot to this site’s inception in June 2012. THAT important.
…The process by which Morsi was removed was the same as the process by which Mubarak was removed; popular protests followed by the military choosing sides. The media supported the overthrow of Mubarak and therefore has no credible reason for opposing the removal of Morsi by many of the same people and through the same methods… except support for the Muslim Brotherhood.
Meanwhile McCain, Rubio and a bunch of Democrats have authored a letter to Kerry with pro-Brotherhood talking points. Most of it is filler, but the stinger comes at the end.
‘As we saw during the Arab Spring uprisings, choking off all peaceful and legitimate avenues for dissent coupled with unaccountable institutions fuels violent extremism and increases the likelihood of long-term instability. …
FromConservative Tribune: El-Haddad had worked for the Clinton Foundation for five years, after which he left to become a “professional propagandist” for the new Muslim Brotherhood government that sprang up after Hosni Mubarak was deposed.
Not too much difference in job duties, I imagine.
El-Haddad received the life sentence from Judge Mohammed Nagi Shehata earlier this month. He’s actually rather lucky: Some of the more serious cases ended in a death sentence….
While the New York Times last month reported the sentencing of Haddad and more than 35 others, one of which is an American as “harsh,” it failed to report El-Haddad’s connection to the Clinton Foundation.
The presiding judge, Mohammed Nagi Shehata, sentenced more than 35 other defendants in the case to the same penalty and also confirmed death sentences in the same case for about a dozen defendants, including the Muslim Brotherhood’s top spiritual guide, Mohamed Badie, 71, as well as Mr. Soltan’s father, Salah Soltan.
Gehad el-Haddad, a spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, was also sentenced to life in prison. Members of the Soltan family have said they will appeal the decision, and other defendants are expected to appeal as well….
This is one more matter that the Clinton’s should want to distance themselves from is only the mainstream media did its job.
According to a three-part series published by the Washington Times, it was Hillary Clinton who was insisting that the U.S. remove Libya’s Muammar Gadhafi in 2011 while pushing false narratives to do so. These reports have allegedly caught the attention of the House Select Committee on Benghazi. What must be included in this analysis is just how influential Clinton’s most trusted adviser Huma Abedin was and is. If anyone had a vested interest in removing Gadhafi from power to benefit Libya’s Muslim Brotherhood rebels, it was Huma’s Muslim Brotherhood family….
‘Top Pentagon officials and a senior Democrat in Congress so distrusted Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2011 march to war in Libya that they opened their own diplomatic channels with the Gadhafi regime in an effort to halt the escalating crisis, according to secret audio recordings recovered from Tripoli….