~ “I hope we once again have reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts.” Ronald Reagan.
I am totally against paying drug addicts to get vasectomies, eugenics, eugenic sterilization AND genetic engineering. I am equally suspect anyone offering this service as a charity or otherwise. Not to mention, guess what the drug addicts going to do with the money he is paid???? BUY MORE DRUGS.
“The man, known as John, who has been addicted to heroin for 15 years, was given £200 by an Americancharity in return for having a vasectomy.
Project Prevention, the charity running the scheme, has made similar payments to thousands of men and women in America in a crusade to prevent them having children who may inherit their addictions.
The 38-year-old man said he had been involved with drugs since the age of 11 or 12 and that the offer of money had ‘spurred’ him into having the operation.
He said: ‘It was kind of what spurred me into doing it in a way.
‘It was something that I’d been thinking about for a long time and something that I’d already made my mind up that I wanted to do. Just hadn’t got around to it.’
The charity began offering the cash incentive to British addicts after paying 3,500 American men and women addicted to drugs or alcohol to be sterilised….”
You have to love the left who won’t send you to rehab but will pay you to snip you. How flipping humane.
“If I were the mother of a suffering child – I mean a deeply suffering child – I would be the first to want to put a pillow over its face . . . If it was a child I really loved, who was in agony, I think any good mother would.” Virginia Ironside, Columnist
“The controversial author and journalist has previously argued that doctors should not fight to save very premature babies.
Her latest comments were made as doctors prepared to lobby for a change in the law to allow people to help the terminally ill to die.
Disability campaigner Clair Lewis accused Miss Ironside of using physical suffering as an excuse for advocating eugenics, through the abortion of disabled children.
She said: ‘The problems that disabled people face will not be fixed by killing off unborn children.’
GP Peter Evans, of the Christian Medical Fellowship, said: ‘For us to make judgments that people are not worth life, not worth the opportunity to live, is a very dangerous thing.”
Progressives are evil and dangerous creatures. Virginia Ironside is proof positive of that fact.
How can anyone say think that being smothered to death does not inflict suffering and that by committing such an act they are indeed being merciful? Yet as Ironside purports, she loves them like a “good mother”?
“..With hypocritical mockers in feasts, they gnashed on me with their teeth.
17 Lord, how long will you look on? rescue my soul from their destructions, my darling from the lions.
18 I will give you thanks in the great congregation: I will praise you among much people.
19 Let not them that are my enemies wrongfully rejoice over me: neither let them wink with the eye that hate me without a cause.
20 For they speak not peace: but they devise deceitful matters against them that are quiet in the land…” Psalms 35.
‘…This Birth Control Movement turned Abortion-on-Demand propaganda was a product, in large part, ofMargaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood and an elite American (married to oil tycoon Noah Slee). The perpetuation of the lie of ‘Reproductive Freedom’ has been championed, in particular, by America’s elite (of any race). It was an elitist mentality that forged the pseudoscience ofeugenics, that drove America’s race-based segregation laws, developed early and present-day immigration policy (i.e. Immigration Act of 1924) and was the bedrock of the Birth Control now-turned Abortion Industry. According to Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, ‘we are paying for…an ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.’2Her eugenic Birth Control philosophy, to prevent the ‘unfit’, ‘feeble-minded’, ‘poor’ or ‘unwanted’, would have eliminated Abraham Lincoln, George Washington Carver, Rosa Parks, Ben Carson, and Oprah Winfrey…just to name a few. Today, abortion kills more African-Americans, per year, than heart disease, cancer, respiratory disease, accidents, homicides, suicide, and cancer–combined.3Black women have abortions at over 3x the rate of white women.4The truth screams loud and clear–we are killing our very future….’
“The Negro Project was initiated in 1939 by Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. It was a collaborative effort between the American Birth Control League and Sanger’s Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau.1For a eugenist, it wasn’t controversial, it was integral to the implementation of eugenics to eliminate the ‘unfit’. Eugenics is ‘the study and practice of selective breeding applied to humans, with the aim of improving the species.’2Negative eugenics focused on preventing the birth of those it considered inferior or unfit. This was the foundation of Sanger’s Birth Control Policy and advocated throughout her writings, speeches, and her periodicals including ‘Pivot of Civilization’, ‘Plan for Peace’ and countless Birth Control Review articles. The pseudo-science (racial hygiene theory) of negative eugenics influenced social policy and eugenics-based legislation (Immigration Act of 19243, segregation laws, sterilization laws) and led to the racial hygiene theory adopted by the Nazis. Noted eugenist, Eugen Fischer, was funded by The Rockefeller Foundation (one of many same organizations that also financially supported Sanger’s work), was responsible for the Nazi adoption of racial hygiene theory at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute that led to the eugenics implementation of the holocaust.4The connection between American Eugenics and the horrors of Nazi Germany are irrefutable. The preponderance of evidence of where Sanger wanted to go (although she decried the atrocities of the holocaust after WWII) shows the ignorance and naivete of Eugenics philosophy and its eventual conclusion, left undeterred. The Negro Project was but a precursor to what eugenists wanted to implement on a much larger scale.
‘The main objectives of the [proposed] Population Congress is to…apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.’
– Margaret Sanger, ‘Plan for Peace’, 1932 Senate hearing5
This is the same Sanger who persuaded a few reluctant, yet incredibly influential, black ministers to join in her Birth Control movement. To dispel the rising doubts among those who objected to Birth Control on religious and moral grounds, Sanger wrote that ‘the ministers work is also important…offering to train him in their ideals because ‘we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members’.6Many use this statement to bolster the claim that Sanger wanted to exterminate all of the black population, but this statement is about reducing a certain type of black individual that Sanger believed should be eliminated, sterilized, or segregated onto farms.7Those who were poor and (supposedly) less intelligent. Eugenists believed the entirety of the black population were intellectually and racially inferior. (Sanger’s ideological agreement and written/spoken solidarity with the eugenics movements does throw legitimate doubt on whether it was only a segment of the black population that was being targeted.) With the help of elite and famous African-Americans Mary McLeod Bethune, W. E. B. DuBois, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, Sr., the Negro Project was able to be sold as a solution to poverty and high birth rates. It is crucial, however, to understand this endeavor in conjunction with Sanger’s dominant efforts of ‘eliminating the unfit’ and her hatred of charitable organizations. She devotes an entire chapter on charities and how those who finance them ‘are dropping millions into rosewater philanthropies and charities that are silly at best and vicious at worst.’8
‘Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease…Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks [of people] that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.’
– Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, Chapter V, ‘Cruelty of Charity’
Black Children are an Endangered Species.
Here is the simple truth. The intent of Sanger’s Negro Project is firmly intact. Nearly 40% of all African-American pregnancies end in induced abortion.9This is by design. Abortion kills more black people than the seven leading causes of death combined (heart disease, cancer, strokes, accidents, diabetes, homicide, and chronic lower respiratory diseases) according to CDC data.10The African-American abortion rate is 3x that of the white population and over 2x that of all other races combined. Sounds like a crisis, doesn’t it? The media has been mostly silent. Our churches are mostly silent. But the truth screams loud and clear. Under the false liberty of ‘reproductive freedom’ we are killing our very future”
The first proven nonsurgical permanent birth-control product for women? I don’t think so. Such a program has been implemented before. It was called forced sterilization aka compulsory sterilization and it sounds like there is a plan to re-implement this travesty not just nationwide, but globally. After all, it is about money and there is no shortage of guinea pigs to go around.
“It’s been around for years, and most of the time it had operating losses….
The firm’s one and only product is called Essure. Using a thin telescopic instrument called a hysteroscope, a doctor inserts the coiled-spring device into the fallopian tube through the cervix.
The body then forms a natural barrier around the micro-insert to prevent sperm from reaching the egg.
The procedure can be done quickly and in a doctor’s office.
99.8% Effective
Clinical data show the procedure to be 99.8% effective with zero pregnancies based on four years of follow-up.
Conceptus was initially formed in 1992, but it wasn’t until 2002 that the Food and Drug Administration gave approval to market Essure in the U.S. It took longer, however, for insurance companies to reimburse patients for the procedure.
‘Sales from 2006, when reimbursement was universal, (have) shown good growth,’ said analyst Jonathan Block of SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.
Sales that year doubled from the earlier year to $42 million. In 2008, revenue hit the $100 million mark. Conceptus reports fourth-quarter and full-year results in February…”
Like I said there is money to be made.
Is this so surprising considering we have an administration in place that supports eugenics? Barack Obama’s appointee, John Holdren, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology supports forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet.
This is about money. Therefore, someone has to be the guinea pig and the timing is perfect with Obamacare lurking on the horizon, the opportunity for Democrats to make money and I repeat, no shortage of guinea pigs.
“In the U.S., the firm is aiming awareness campaigns at what it says are the 7.5 million women ‘who have completed their families, but rely on temporary forms of birth control with lower efficacy …
The most likely near-term market opportunity in the U.S., analysts say, consists of some 500,000 women a year who opt for tubal ligation, a permanent birth-control measure that requires surgery and is considered riskier. Tubal ligation is also more expensive.
And then there are opportunities outside the U.S., where about 25% of Conceptus’ revenue is generated. Fifty percent comes from France.
‘Yes, we have only one product,’ Chief Financial Officer Gregory Lichtwardt said in a phone call. ‘But our view is that it has an enormous opportunity.’
In the U.S., he says, the potential could be 1 million procedures a year and up to twice that number outside the U.S. in places such as Europe and South America, for example.
Lichtwardt says awareness among women between 35 and 45, ‘who are most relevant to us,’ is probably in the low single digits.”
According to the manufacturer and the advertisement, the target audience for this product is women between the ages of 35 and 45. Think again, nothing could be further from the truth.
This product will be used on girls from child-bearing age and women up to the age of 45. Once this product is up and running, history will repeat itself, and only a fool would say this would never happen again in the United States. Think about it.
PUMABydesign001's Blog 