~ “I hope we once again have reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts.” Ronald Reagan.
Published once, in September, this is just a reminder. Tell your well-meaning Democrats, just in case they haven’t been paying attention.
Why would the Left be puffing up numbers of a Blue Wave when the numbers don’t justify that…unless they have an alternate plan as to how to make those numbers seem real?
The numbers don’t add up.
It makes no sense for anyone with a family, unless wealthy, or works for Google or Facebook, or has a position anywhere other than a university, or a 6 x 6 cubicle inside a governmeny office building, to go out and vote for a Party that has thrown in 100% with full-fledged enemies of freedom.
Except for their Few, that is.
There are a lot of them; 1) the Democrat Party all the way down to grass roots operatives, 2) as well as some portion of the deep state, (the entrenched federal bureaucracy) 3) as well as the most prominent members of the national media, such as network news organizations (ABC, CBS, NBC), cable news (CNN and MSNBC), national print media (New York Times, LA Times, Washington Post). and virtually every big city print daily in America, none of whom are owned by residents of their cities anymore.
These are the “Elites” and they make up 3-4 million people, 1.5%-2.0% of the total population, about 4% of the voters.
But they have their client base, a group that follows national and world events, at least rhetorically, for it is through a prism provided by the groups named above, and who have an unnatural love of themselves alongside a down-the-nose antipathy for all others. I call these the “In-Group”. They amount to little more than 15 million adults, and maybe another 10 million if you throw in wannabe one-issue college students (pro-abortion, anti-freedom of speech, global warning, gay-transgender rights) who will actually bother to vote.
Then add another 20 million from the “Client Group”, people who live off the fat of the land, who do no work today, and who are content to stay that way. (This group is diminishing almost daily, for every new job costs Democrats 1 -2 voters).
Fact: Today, the working people in America who work outside the government sector, once the backbone of the Democrat Party, can find no virtue in voting for a Democrat anymore[…]
Message to every Barack Obama holdover jumping on Obama’s train named, “Sedition,” you do so at your own risk.” Shhh.
Case in point, FEC Commissioner, Ellen Weintraub’s letter dated February 10th challenging President Trump’s claims of voter fraud in the 2016 elections. Weintraub, an arrogant Progressive, wrote the letter on FEC letterhead. Oops!
A Democratic Federal Elections Commission official may have violated federal ethics laws in her quest to have President Donald Trump provide proof that voter fraud occurred in New Hampshire during the 2016 elections, experts say.
FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub, who has for days called on Trump to prove his claim that he and former Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte lost in New Hampshire due to voter fraud, released an official statement Feb. 10 asking Trump to substantiate the scheme.
“According to widespread news reports circulating today, President Trump has alleged an astonishing voter-fraud scheme that he claims denied him and former Sen. Kelly Ayotte victory in the state of New Hampshire in the 2016 elections,” the statement reads[…]
Earlier this year, Mother Jones, dismissed concerns by Governor Gregg Abbott (R-Tx) that voter fraud existed going so far as to deride allegations from Republicans of widespread voter fraud as “talking points that refuses to die.”
In the article, Mother Jones links to Progressive propagandists, among them MSNBC and The New York Times whom in 2008, 2012, 2014 and to date dismiss allegations of voter fraud.
…According to Politifact, there were just 85 prosecutions for voter fraud in Texas from 2002 to 2015, and not all of them led to convictions. That’s a paltry number considering that more than 42 million ballots were cast in the state’s general elections from 2002 to 2014.
The reality is that voter fraud—which includes a range of offenses from impersonating another voter to casting more than one vote—is extraordinarily rare.…”
Not surprisingly, Republican Party leadership and Republican Party attorneys have stated that concerns of voter fraud are unfounded and that rigging the election on a national level impossible “citing the various systems in place that would make such an endeavor complicated and unfeasible” as stated by Mark Braden, Esq. of Baker and Hostetler. Braden also happens to be the Republican National Committee’s former chief counsel.
I take it that by “various systems in place” Braden is referring to, for starters
the bus and van loads of Somali Muslims in the state of Ohio who were driven to the polls back in 2012. Since the Muslims who did not speak English arrived at the polls at a time when no Republican Party interpreter was present, we know who they were directed to cast their vote for;
rigged re-calibrated voting machines that switched Republican votes to Democrat back in 2014 and allegedly vice versa in earlier elections;
manufacturer, GEMS election management system which operates under the names Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems*, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems*, and Election Systems & Software including private contractors (*Clinton donors).
Voter fraud by any other name…
GEMS counts 25% of the votes in the United States and according to a study by Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org:
The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes.
the machines are operated in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming (and Canada).
Harris is referring to something called, “weighting” of races” which removes the one person, one vote principle.
… a weighted race feature was designed which not only gives some votes more weight than others, but does so based on the voter’s identity. Ballots are connected to voters, weights are assigned to each voter per race, stored in an external table not visible in GEMS. Our testing shows that one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to zero….
Enter Smartmatic International Corporation an ‘elections solutions provider’ whose Chairman of the Board of Directors is Mark Malloch-Brown, Vice Chairman of Open Society Foundation (a Soros entity).
In her article, S. Noble of Independent Sentinelreports that Smartmartic’s equipment is used worldwide, has delivered questionable results in more than one nation; and on Election Day will oversee voting in 16 states “including voter registration, the printing of ballots, the programming of the voting machines, the counting and tabulation of the votes, and the final reporting of the results for… millions of Americans…”
Where there is smoke, there is fire –About those illegal voters casting ballots.
James O’Keefe of Project Veritas, just hours ago, released a second video of a multi-part series exposing the existence of voter fraud.
What better way to prove that voter fraud exists than to get it straight from the source?
In the video belpw, Americans United for Change, National Field Director Scott Foval (now former National Field Direct0r), admits that the Democratic Party has been rigging the system (elections) and skirting the law for a half-century “we’ve been bussing people in to deal with you fuckin’ assholes [Republicans] for fifty years and we’re not going to stop now, we’re just going to find a different way to do it.”
In his arrogance, Foval boldly exposes what and how to bus people across state lines to vote while skirting the laws.
“How do they keep it a secret from the American people and the FEC? Foval explains, ‘So you use shells. Use shell companies.’
The final straw is Foval and the Democrats don’t think journalists, the media or the law can do anything to stop him, the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign. ‘The question is, whether when you get caught by a reporter, does that matter? Because does it turn into an investigation or not? In this case, this state, the answer is no, because they don’t have any power to do anything.’
Skirting the law apparently is no longer an issue considering the power that Progressives have amassed the past fifty years enabling them to intentionally pass legislation with loopholes that give passage to voter fraud.
Throughout the 2008 and 2012 presidential election season, Progressives controlled the message, for the most part kept their talking heads in check when it came to propaganda (not to mention voter and election fraud).
Well that was then and this is now. Progressives set their creation loose on the country and the ideologues cannot (will not) allow themselves to be controlled.
Enter Rosario Dawson who while ragging Hillary Clinton this weekend over Super Pac donations invoked Monica Lewinsky and the intimidation, suppression of voters by the Progressive establishment desperate to control the message and outcome of the 2016 Presidential election.
Dawson’s statement obviously referred to the “mistaken” purge of more than 126,000 Democratic voters living in Brooklyn, New York from the rolls by New York City’s Board of Elections between December 2015 and last week’s primary. [Coincidentally (not), Bernie Sanders was born in Brooklyn.]
Yeah, that is going to leave a mark. Moreover, I do not believe that Bernie Sanders can handle Rosario Dawson or for that matter, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders on Sunday did not directly answer a question about whether it was appropriate for actress Rosario Dawson, a Sanders surrogate, to mention former White House intern Monica Lewinsky at a rally Saturday.
“Rosario is a great actress and she’s doing a great job for us,” Sanders said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I have no idea in what context Rosario is talking about, but I would hope that all of our people talk about the real issue.”
Sanders also said people should be talking about climate change instead of his surrogate.
“And, by the way, it might be a good idea for all of us, including TV networks, to start talking about the planetary crisis of climate change,” Sanders added[…]