One Ring to Rule Them All

Tags

2018 election, Ayn Rand, Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey Ford, Conservatism, Democrat Party, Donald Trump, Education, Elitism and Class, Lord of the Rings, race and culture, Veterans' Tales

Unified Patriots by Vassar Bushmills

When a political end trumps personal destruction of the innocent, we know we are among evil people, from Jeff Flake, Lisa Murkowski, to DiFi, to CNN and dozens more.

The cynical indifference to the infliction of pain and suffering on innocent people is the greatest sin…

…cold blooded murder or rape not even close seconds…for it is a judgment against the greater society.

It’s not that there is still not a scintilla of evidence that supports the assault claim by Ms Christine Blasey-Ford, for that only points the finger of guilt at her. A single soul lost to burn. Happens every day.

But when men and women, feigning conscience and good faith can hide behind their high offices in the fortress of an institution seen by the People as the fountain of law and justice and honor, and are not only willing but attempting to destroy good men and their entire families for a shallow political end, or perhaps only for mere spite and malice of a personal nature, they are betraying everything that is holy to this Republic.

I know what you’re thinking, I’d like to be building the scaffold right now, but we really need to diagram these people so as to better understand their Game:

Ayn Rand, in her 1971 essay, “The Age of Envy” and which I referred to as “Children of the Damned” in my 2013 essay, diagrammed these players.

Haters: Miss Rand portrayed the school culture of Christine Blasey as that of privileged spoiled children, only in high school, as Christine was a few years away from being taught the hate part in college, only the self-indulgence part, K-12. The appetizer before the entrée[…]

Continue Reading

The 2018 Election Heist, A Call to Arms

Tags

2018 mid-term elections, Democratic Party, Donald Trump, Elitism and Class, establishment, illegal voters, Republican Party, Voter Fraud

(Pixabay)

Unified Patriots by Vassar Bushmills

Why would the Left be puffing up numbers of a Blue Wave when the numbers don’t justify that…unless they have an alternate plan as to how to make those numbers seem real?

The numbers don’t add up.

It makes no sense for anyone with a family who has a position anywhere other than a university, unless wealthy, works for Google or Facebook, or works in a 6 x 6 cubicle inside a government office building, to go out and vote for a Party that has thrown in 100% with full-fledged enemies of freedom.

Except for their Few, that is.

There are a lot of them; 1) the Democrat Party all the way down to grass roots operatives, 2) as well as some portion of the deep state, (the entrenched federal bureaucracy) 3) as well as the most prominent members of the national media, such as network news organizations (ABC, CBS, NBC), cable news (CNN and MSNBC), national print media (New York Times, LA Times, Washington Post). and virtually every big city print daily in America, none of whom are owned by residents of their cities anymore.

These are the “Elites” and they make up 3-4 million people, 1.5%-2.0% of the total population, about 4% of the voters.

But they have their client base, a group that follows national and world events, at least rhetorically, for it is through a prism provided by the groups named above, and who have an unnatural love of themselves alongside a down-the-nose antipathy for all others. I call these the “In-Group”.  They amount to little more than 15 million adults, and maybe another 10 million if you throw in wannabe one-issue college students (pro-abortion, anti-freedom of speech, global warning, gay-transgender rights) who will actually bother to vote.

Then add another 20 million from the “Client Group”, people who live off the fat of the land, who do no work today, and who are content to stay that way. (This group is diminishing almost daily, for every new job costs Democrats 1 -2 voters).

Fact: Today, the working people in America who work outside the government sector, once the backbone of the Democrat Party, can find no virtue in voting for a Democrat anymore[…]

Continue Reading

Da Mob, a Look at Democrat Party Election Practices…

Tags

2016 Presidential Election, criminal gangs, Democratic Party, Donald Trump, Mafia, millennials, organized crime

Unified Patriots by Vassar Bushmills

I read enough to know that most people believe the Democrat Party acts like a criminal gang, but still won’t draw an image in their minds as to just how a criminal gang works.

I’m going to give you some leads here, and then, no matter where you live, red-blue, urban-suburban-rural, I suggest you sit down with other friends and begin to war-game just exactly what the criminal wing of the Democrat Party might try to do to steal or suppress votes in your area in the 2018 and 2020 elections.

Forget media advertising, that’s mostly background noise; an artillery barrage before the ground assault. It rarely determines the outcome of an election. Donald Trump proved all the media money in the world can’t help if they don’t have a powerful message.

Your county could be 90% blue, or 90% red, no matter, there are people there who are paid to steal 5, 500, or 5000 votes in any way they can. What should matter to you most is they are not volunteers. They are paid and everyone has some sort of quota to meet; like a traffic cop.

All I can try to do here is to get you to adopt the proper frame of mind about this Mob. You have to think like a mobster…a small-time mobster, working at the front end, like Vinnie and Augie, whose primary job back in the Chicago protection rackets days, was to go into small businesses up and down the street, and squeeze the shop-owner for the Mob’s end of their monthly revenue.

Democrats squeeze a lot more than you know.

Trust me, they’re there. Only you will likely never know who they are by name.

What I want you to do is learn to think like them, so you can know how their system works, who answers to who. just so you can picture in your mind an accurate situation analysis, as they see it.

Every great general knew what his opposing general knew about his own assets, especially his limitations, and then used his troops to go after those vital weaknesses. Democrats are very knowledgeable about Republican’s weaknesses, especially the things we won’t do; fight dirty, kick a man when he’s down, Marquis of Queensbury sorts of things.

Knowing matters.

Just try to think like a mobster in the 20’s, who were almost all first generation immigrants. They stated out as gangs but ended up as vertical criminal enterprises, by a simple Darwin formula of survival of the fittest[…]

Continue Reading

The Two Faces of the Deep State and “the People”

Tags

Bureaucracy, Conservatism, Democratic Party, Democratic Socialists of America, Donald Trump, Elitism and Class, KKK, National Review, Religion, Tea Party, The Left, U.S. Constitution

(Wikimedia Commons)

Unified Patriots by Vassar Bushmills

So when they say “the FBI, or DOJ or CIA said this, or did that” – your first thought should be, “Which one?” Especially if it’s the media telling you these things.

Also, never forget that is has been this way since at least JFK.

In 1998, a man asked me to help write a book directed at the very people who are now taking back the country, one piece of government at a time. I complained to him that he was asking me to write a book for people “who don’t read.” He said, “Yep.” He died in 2006, and I’ve been trying to write that book, one chapter at a time, ever since.

The Deep State

A little history: For all I know elements of the deep state have been around since Wilson. Those are the career bureaucrats who will move mountains to do things their way, and always protect their jobs, and grow their numbers when the opportunity arises. That’s just part of the human condition, and yes, the Founders understood this. It’s as in a bureaucracy’s DNA to want to do this as it is a deer’s need to rut every autumn.

If governments through the ages have had a fixed star, it would begin with their Bureaucracy.

In the debates over how the new Constitution of 1787 should look, one constant both Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans seemed to agree was that the size and power of government should depend entirely on the people’s control of the men who both could increase the size and mission of government, and also raise the money to pay for it.

Despite their animosity towards one another, the Federalists and Republicans were of one mind about keeping the federal government very lean. The idea that the federal government should want to grow did not begin until the formation of the Democratic Party and Andrew Jackson, 1824-28, when the spoils system was first introduced…after all the lions had passed away.

But they finally got an income tax in 1913 (16th Amendment), (count the years, by generations, 126 and 4) which, while very, very small, its fine print enabled Congress to increase it almost at will, and then, 19 years later, 1932, with the Great Depression, and the next generation of Progressives called in to fix it, (FDR and the New Deal), the government grew like mushrooms in a rain forest. Many of those programs survived well into the 60’s, until LBJ could replace them with a new set of programs, The Great Society, which haunts us still[…]

Continue Reading

TRADE BRINKSMANSHIP, NOT TRADE WAR, VERSUS GLOBALISM

Tags

brinksmanship, bureaucrcy, China, Donald Trump, Elitism and Class, EU, JFK, Muslim Brotherhood, race and culture, Ronald Reagan, tariff war, trade war

Vassar Bushmills

“Trade War” is a term the enemies of Donald Trump use to denigrate his proposals for restoring a balance to American trade policies.

Only it’s not “trade war” but trade brinkmanship, which, as it was first used to define JFK’s strategy against the USSR in his years in the White House, were intended to prevent a war, not execute one.

I’m actually old enough to remember those days, and the term’s use so know it’s not unlike the principle’s laid down by Donald Trump in his best seller Art of the Deal.

JFK’s use of the term vis a vis the USSR and Khrushchev was not unlike Reagan at Reykjavik in ’86 or Trump-Putin at Helsinki only a few days ago. In each case the American president, out of the hearing of the media, laid all their power cards on the table, making it clear to the other side we could not be matched. Out of sight of the kibitzers this could be done by allowing them to save face, and go home and give it some deeper thought. Khrushchev brought the missiles out of Cuba, Gorby threw in the towel as he knew they could not match our economy in developing our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), and likely Putin got the same message, for of three Russian versions, 1962, 1986 and 2018, his position is weakest. Yep. Weakest.

Trade issues with the European Union and China are essentially no different; known strengths versus known weaknesses.

All of China’s plans for regional political hegemony are based on the success of their economy, and most of that would go up in smoke if America quit buying their stuff. The sheer size of our market dwarfs all others.

(There are dozens of fatal flaws in the Chinese internal management system and the way they did their book that made them vulnerable to even regional competition, with US private sector support, which I first set out to prove in 1989, before the fall of the Berlin Wall which directed me elsewhere. In Asia I liked working with local entrepreneurs but found American partners impossible. The American manufacturing ethos has since changed, so if I were to midwife relationships today, I’d look for American small business entrepreneurs who are a little more hands-on.)

[…]

Continue Reading

Charles Krauthammer, America’s Greatest Tory, a Postscript.

Tags

Bill Kristol, Chjarles Krauthammer, Conservatism, Constitution, Donald Trump, Elitism, Elitism and Class, George Will, Richard Brookhiser

Unified Patriots by Vassar Bushmills

I wrote the essay that follows in Jan 2015, almost 6 months before Donald Trump announced his candidacy. So read in that context, for the conversation was more about the hard solutions being offered by radicals such as Ted Cruz than the soon to be “clown”, Donald Trump.

Who doesn’t hang on every word of Charles Krauthammer? He is conservatism’s finest wordsmith, the last word on just about every outrage of government for the past 15 years. For many, Charles has been America’s Ben Franklin on every public issue, bringing a historic scope to the sociology and psychology of government and politics unmatched by any other commentator.

There’s only one hitch. Ben Franklin went where Charles isn’t willing to go.

Last Friday, while commenting about Mitt Romney getting into the presidential race again, Charles mentioned that if Mitt jumps in, it would split moderate voters (and establishment big money), regretfully hinting that this might, in turn, hand the 2016 nomination to, well you know, one of “them”; any one of a number of wrecking-crew Sam Adams types such as Ted Cruz, Scott Walker, Rick Perry, just to name a few. In Charles’ eyes, these are all are unsuitable for that high office, or for that matter, a good game of cribbage over a good port after dinner.

It seems the one thing that separates Dr Krauthammer from Dr Franklin was Ben’s willingness to break with the King and start up a new nation here, risking life, fortune and sacred honor in the process. For Charles, being asked to cast his lot in with common revolutionaries seems to be a bridge too far.

Consequently, we should be more careful about Charles’ strategic advice, for while the finest of analysts, it’s a dead giveaway about where he is unwilling to go, or see America taken. He is not alone, so learn to look for this status preference in other conservatives, from seniors such as George Will, to a host of newbies such as Erick Erickson. Their rice bowls and public reputations are bound up in the survival of the current King, the Washington Establishment, and can be relied on to pull their punches when the Establishment, and their place in it, are placed in jeopardy[…]

Continue Reading