• About
    • Who am I? What am I doing here? How did I get here? (updated 10/29/2013)
  • Contact Form
  • FAIR USE NOTICE

PUMABydesign001's Blog

~ “I hope we once again have reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts.” Ronald Reagan.

PUMABydesign001's Blog

Tag Archives: Democracy

Next War, Should we Give Occupation a Chance?

18 Friday Aug 2017

Posted by bydesign001 in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Next War, Should we Give Occupation a Chance?

Tags

Democracy, history, war


Unified Patriots by Vassarbushmills

Ever hear the rally cry, “Remember the Maine!” How about “yellow journalism”? Well, they were fathered by the same men, Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, of “Citizen Kane” fame. Both were newspaper publishers, and also Democrat congressmen. Hearst even ran for president.

Their newspaper chains had been pushing for war against the Spanish Empire in the western hemisphere since the people of Cuba had risen up against Spain in 1895, citing the Monroe Doctrine as sufficient legal justification to drive the Spanish out. Hence was born “yellow journalism”. (I just thought you should know its pedigree.)

In January 1898, the battleship USS Maine, laying at anchor in Havana Harbor, blew up. A mine they rushed to say. And the jingo-cry “Remember the Maine” headlined Hearst and Pulitzer newspapers coast-to-cost and America was suddenly at war. And we quickly drove the Spanish out of the hemisphere.

And we also relieved the Spanish of their Asian possessions as well, for which the people of the Philippines are largely grateful, in part because the United States kept its word about when, how, and in what condition, we would hand the islands back over to civilian control, in just over 40 years. (A world record by imperialist standards.) Wobbly at times, the Republic of Philippines is still a functioning democracy after 70 years.

Now, the logical leap here, considering the obvious similarities between the run-up to the war in Cuba and the yellow journalism of the modern media in trying to stir public sentiment about a looming war with North Korea, would be to conclude that this is the subject of my discussion here.

It isn’t, in part because the entire North Korea war-drum beat today is a canard, only today the American media knows it while the jingo-media of 1898 didn’t, for it was another 80 years before it was determined that the Maine likely blew from accumulated coal gas in the power plants. If viewed in the cold light of day, war with North Korea isn’t looming at all, and those who aren’t glued to jingo headlines know it.

But after that war, we turned Cuba over to its own devices, while we occupied the Philippines. Now we didn’t exactly do a bang up job in the Philippines, but Cuba fared much worse going it alone, as has virtually every other Latin American democracy, almost all of which were products of either Spanish or Portuguese administrations for over 250 years.

In 2003, I sat down in the Staked Plains of the Texas Panhandle with an old Russia hand who also had had a great deal of experience in the Middle East. (I met him in the Moscow McDonalds in 1991, before the Fall.) In a long, rambling exposition  he laid out his theory as to why American-style democracy could succeed in the Middle East and why no other democracy model could.

Paul Bremer was in charge in Iraq at the time, and the Iraqis were about to have their first election. And Bush and Bremer were doing it wrong, Moses Sands said.

(I abridged that long piece and republished it at RedState in 2010, and then in book form along with some other essays on the Middle East at the start of Arab Spring in 2011, at Amazon.com.)

The premise of his argument, which I’ve held to religiously ever since, is that since America was created from the bottom-up, only an American model of government can cause the people of another country to turn against their old ways, from tribalism to top-down local government models, by building new institutions from the bottom-up. Existing institutions at the tribal and local level, which Bremer tried to build on, generally work against the individual citizen from pursuing his own life and liberty with his House as the foundation.

As an occupying conqueror in Iraq we had a duty to try to change that.

Iraq never had a chance[…]

Continue Reading

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Gab.ai
  • MeWe
  • Tea Party Community
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • scoop.it
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • More
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

With Apologies to Mr. Franklin

23 Saturday Jul 2016

Posted by bydesign001 in Election 2016

≈ Comments Off on With Apologies to Mr. Franklin

Tags

David French, Democracy, Donald Trump, Mob Rule, populism, Tyranny


Grumpy Opinions by Bob Montgomery

Ben-Franklin

A republic is a form of government, but a democracy is an ethos. It is “one-man (yes, one-woman, Ivanka!)/one vote.” It is the notion that the citizen is the lowest common denominator, and thus the foundation, of the State. We have, with the Trump Derangement Syndrome plaguing the #NeverTrumpers of various pursuits around the nation (and mostly in the environs of the District of Columbia and nearby) a coterie of people squawking about “nationalism” and “national populism” and various other movement labels that they find repulsive. The truth is, what they find repulsive is citizen participation in the political process.

David French

My disturbance today is caused by an article written by the National Review correspondent, David French. His presidential campaign never quite got off the ground, but he works tirelessly nevertheless for….the cause. He writes the usual stuff about the Fabulous Founders’ oft-mentioned warnings about the dangers of a (pure) democracy, or “mob rule”. But then he goes further with this:

In other words, there is nothing magical or inherently virtuous about the “will of the people.” The people are just as capable of error, just as capable of becoming tyrants, as any tin-pot dictator.

Oh….dear. Nothing magical or inherently virtuous about the “will of the people”? Mr. French, if you were talking about the people who demanded that the authorities give up Barabbas, we might entertain, even second, that emotion. But we are talking now, not about them[…]

Continue Reading — With Apologies to Mr. Franklin

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Gab.ai
  • MeWe
  • Tea Party Community
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • scoop.it
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • More
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

How States Sterilized 60,000 Americans – And Got Away with It

31 Sunday Jan 2016

Posted by bydesign001 in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Democracy, Eugenics, Immigration, racism, Science, Sterilization, Supreme Court


 

Foundation for Economic Education

On the morning of October 19, 1927, the Commonwealth of Virginia sterilized Carrie Buck.

Dr. John Bell — whose name would forever be linked with Carrie’s in the Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell  — cut her open and removed a section from each of her Fallopian tubes. In his notes, Dr. Bell noted that “this was the first case operated on under the sterilization law.”

Carrie Buck was an average, unassuming girl who grew up around Charlottesville. She wasn’t very smart, but she wasn’t dumb either. She didn’t come from the best circumstances, but she did the best with what she had.

Pictures show a plain young woman with short, dark hair, bobbed in the fashion of the time. In one photo, taken by Arthur Estabrook, an “expert” in arthur estabrook eugenicisteugenics whose testimony would help seal her fate, Carrie sits on a bench with her mother Emma at the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-minded, where both were institutionalized.

Estabrook’s photo of Carrie and Emma was taken on November 17th, 1924, the day before Carrie’s trial began. Estabrook had come to visit Carrie and Emma at the urging of Dr. Albert Priddy, the superintendent of the Virginia Colony.

Priddy was building a case against Carrie, a case for her forced sterilization, and he needed a purported expert in the “science” of “inferior genetics” — a.k.a. eugenics — to testify that Carrie, her mother, and Carrie’s six-month-old daughter Vivian were all congenitally and irredeemably “feeble-minded.”

In a different time, Estabrook, with his neatly parted hair and defined features, could have become a well-known character actor, a face “in all those movies.” But Estabrook was employed at the Eugenics Record Office in Cold Spring Harbor, New York, and he was more than prepared to testify to the inferiority of Carrie and her bloodline. Most of his life had been devoted to diagnosing and describing “defective bloodlines” that, in his view, held humanity back.

At the urging of Aubrey Strode, the lawyer for Dr. Priddy and the Virginia State Colony, Estabrook rushed down to Lynchburg to testify against Carrie. Strode believed that the testimony of a true expert in eugenics would be crucial to developing an unassailable legal record proving that Carrie, Emma, and Vivian all carried defective genes and, therefore, that the state had both the authority and the right to sterilize Carrie to prevent any further “feeble-minded” offspring.

He needed such expert testimony if the appellate courts, and possibly even the US Supreme Court, were going to uphold Carrie’s sterilization and thus ratify not only Dr. Priddy’s plans for the mass sterilization of “genetic defectives,” but also the plans of thousands of similar eugenicists around the country. Eugenics was Estabrook’s life work, so of course he came as quickly as he could.

It only took Estabrook a short time to be convinced that Carrie and Emma were hereditarily “feeble-minded.” In the picture he took, Carrie and Emma stare distantly at Estabrook’s camera, seemingly not too happy to have been interrogated by someone who presumed they were imbeciles from the outset.

Carrie and Emma Buck, taken by Arthur Estabrook, Nov. 17, 1924. From eugenicsarchive.org.

Carrie and Emma Buck, taken by Arthur Estabrook, Nov. 17, 1924. From eugenicsarchive.org.

We know Carrie’s story because her case eventually made it to the Supreme Court. But to the Commonwealth of Virginia in the 1920s, Carrie was just another congenitally “feeble-minded” woman who, in the parlance of the times, had a tainted “germ plasm” that would create generations of “socially inadequate defectives” if she were allowed to procreate freely. Carrie is the most famous of the (at least) 60,000 Americans who were forcibly sterilized in order to “cleanse the race” of undesirable genes.

The United States forcibly sterilized people through the 1970s. Many victims are still living. Virginia has apologized for its sterilization program, and, like North Carolina before it, voted to compensate still-living victims.

Yet, even today, many law professors seem to want to sweep Buck v. Bell under the rug. They’d rather talk about Lochner v. New York — when the Court overturned New York’s maximum work hour law as a violation of the liberty of contract — than Buck v. Bell. Judges are still said to be “Lochnerizing” when they are accused of legislating from the bench, but we don’t have a similar adjective form of Buck. Furthermore, because Lochner was overturned during the New Deal, its residual impact on our laws has been minimal. Buck v. Bell’s legacy is far bloodier.

Even for those familiar with the general facts of Buck v. Bell, Carrie’s story is worse than they realize. We now know that she was unknowingly a part of a plot to validate Virginia’s forced sterilization law, passed in 1924 to rid society of “idiocy, imbecility, feeble-mindedness or epilepsy”[…]

 

Continue Reading — How States Sterilized 60,000 Americans – And Got Away with It

 

Permission to republish granted by Foundation for Economic Education (creative commons).

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Gab.ai
  • MeWe
  • Tea Party Community
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • scoop.it
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • More
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

State Official takes PC Approach in Speech re Lure of Youth to Terrorism

17 Wednesday Jun 2015

Posted by bydesign001 in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

and Human Rights, Democracy, Department of State, Extremism, Geneva, Geneva Centre for Security Policy, islamic-terrorism, Political Correctness, Propaganda, psychology, recruiting, Switzerland, Under Secretary for Civilian Security


Sarah Sewall, Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights - State Department, Image courtesy of Flickr U.S. Mission Geneva/Eric Bridiers (Creative Commons).

Sarah Sewall, Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights – State Department, Image courtesy of Flickr U.S. Mission Geneva/Eric Bridiers (Creative Commons).

Department of State official, Sarah Sewall, Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights during a speech Monday at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, Geneva, Switzerland addressed the lure of terrorism…well sort of.

Avoiding the mention of Islamic teachings, Sewall cited Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, i.e., the need for people attain their self-realization and the motivating tools used by extremists to recruit young people into their organizations.

CNS News

Speaking in Geneva on Monday, Undersecretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Sarah Sewall cited a theory in popular psychology – the “hierarchy of needs” – in an attempt to explain why people from widely different backgrounds are attracted to terrorist groups….

Sewall said that while people may be vulnerable to recruitment by extremists due to factors like poverty (‘the inability to provide for oneself or one’s family’) or physical insecurity, needs higher up the hierarchy are also relevant….

Read full article

“due to factors like poverty (‘the inability to provide for oneself or one’s family’)…” Now where have we heard that before? Oh yes, White House talking points.

Earlier this year, Barack Obama declared that the root cause and success of the Islamic State (ISIS) has nothing to do with radical Islam but poverty. Balderdash. Those talking points have been debunked repeatedly.

Screenshot of Abraham Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Source: Wikimedia - FireflySixtySeven

Screenshot of Abraham Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Source: Wikimedia – FireflySixtySeven

Transcript (also available for reading here.)

Good morning everyone. Thank you Dr. Mohamedou, and the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, for inviting me to address this accomplished group of scholars and practitioners on a topic that concerns much of the globe today: the threat of violent extremism. This threat takes many forms and appears throughout the world including: Neo-Nazi actors in the United States or Europe, violent radical Islamist movements in the Middle East and Africa, or extremist Buddhism operating in parts of Asia.

Violent extremism’s growth over the last decade is an extremely dangerous and destabilizing phenomenon. It is essential that the world mobilize against such backward-looking intolerance and cruelty, which threatens humanity’s moral, political, and economic progress. We know that terrorists must be defeated militarily, yet we also see them responding to military force by dispersing, rebranding, aligning and reforming – continuing to spread as new members join their ranks. This underscores the need to adopt a more preventive approach, one that halts the spread of violent extremist networks. This was a unified message from the February White House Summit to Counter Violent Extremism.

Yet we remain challenged by the difficulty of understanding why individuals or communities would join such backward, violent extremist groups. Terror network recruits come from all walks of life: posh suburbs and forgotten slums; from countries rich and poor, repressive and free, stable and conflict-ridden.

They have many complex, overlapping and context-specific motives. This can be confounding for a global community eager to understand why violent extremism proliferates and how we can address it.

Even as our understanding remains incomplete, we have documented a range of grievances and motives that propel individuals, and in some cases, communities to join or align with terrorist actors.

Motives can be identified along what psychologist Abraham Maslow famously posited as a human hierarchy of needs.

Maslow argued that individuals have a range of needs that must be met – in priority order – before people attain their greatest self-realization.

At the bottom of the pyramid are needs critical to physical survival, such as food, shelter and safety.

Higher up the hierarchy of need, individuals look to find love and belonging, self-esteem, and purpose.

In my view, understanding Maslow’s schema usefully helps us disaggregate the reasons that individuals might be “pushed” or “pulled” toward violent extremism. What have been called push factors – the conditions that make individuals or communities vulnerable to extremist recruitment – prominently feature conditions like physical insecurity or the inability to provide for oneself or one’s family. But even where people’s lower-level needs are met, social and political marginalization can impact higher-order human needs such as a valued role or purpose.

The Hierarchy of Needs therefore helps us understand why dramatically different profiles of persons can be drawn to organizations antithetical to what we would identify as progress and humanity.

Any type of violent extremist group exploits human needs all along the spectrum…..

Read full transcript

Talk about going PC all the way, the yawn factor listening to this propaganda on a scale of 1 to 10 had to be a 30.

According to the Office Undersecretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights, Department of State website, their mission is to lead:

State Department efforts to prevent and counter threats to civilian security and effective governance, such as terrorism, violent extremism, mass atrocities and transnational crime. The bureaus and offices reporting to the Under Secretary contribute to the security of the American people and nations around the world by assisting countries to build more democratic, secure, stable, and just societies.

To achieve our mission, we work together, along with other U.S. Government agencies and foreign partners, to prevent and respond to conflict, promote peace and genuine stability, strengthen and develop the rule of law, achieve accountability for atrocities, counter terrorism and violent extremism, build democratic institutions, deepen respect for universal human rights, strengthen civilian protection and security, and advance the United States’ humanitarian policies, practices, and programs around the world…..

As if we don’t have enough government agencies already, the Office of the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights oversees the following agencies:

  • Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations (CSO)
  • Bureau of Counterterrorism (CT)
  • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL)
  • Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL)
  • Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM)
  • Office of Global Criminal Justice (GCJ)
  • Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (TIP)
  • The Open Government Partnership (OGP)

H/t Tammy Bruce.

Image: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Pyramid. Courtesy of FireflySixtySeven, Wikimedia Commons (CC some rights reserved.)

Source: Permanent Mission of the United States of America to theUnited Nations and Other International Organizations in Geneva
the Office Undersecretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights, Department of State

LINKS:
http://www.state.gov/j/
http://www.state.gov/j/remarks/243798.htm
https://geneva.usmission.gov/2015/06/15/combatting-terrorism-looking-over-the-horizon-remarks-by-under-secretary-sarah-sewall/
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MaslowsHierarchyOfNeeds.svg
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/state-dept-official-explains-lure-terrorism-without-mentioning-islam
http://tammybruce.com/2015/06/state-dept-official-lists-factors-attracting-people-to-terrorism-islam-not-mentioned.html
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/02/21/isis-is-massively-wealthy-despite-obamas-contention-poverty-the-cause-of-terrorism/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/us-mission/12931510595/in/photolist-kGHnze-kGGCFB-kGGDwK-kGG61V-kGGCYR-oufV2f-qKbYQa-ow2f7z-oxZBYR-od8aHc-outv4u-ovTQX8-oydWpT-odqPPu-osRTCf-oeWHB5-oeKcHN-oeNXEG-odmaeF-6sEyxf-ourwH5-6sEyMu-oumuW5-otKBGJ-oeTSPh-odhWnp-owm2Ci-oeH3uo-odAUMW-odvMfR-ouhXh2-odcHea-qA8jRN-qSBgtW-qSwwP4-pVUvDM-qQoJ4w-qA8jM9-odah7m-ownLB9-rkerFe-rhWnuf-rmHztH-qpRoGj-r5gtPS-r5gtX7-rmQPqR-r5nacq-ovgsxR-sEsacy/

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Gab.ai
  • MeWe
  • Tea Party Community
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • scoop.it
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • More
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

China Censors Hong Kong’s Protests; Hong Kongers Stand Strong

01 Wednesday Oct 2014

Posted by bydesign001 in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

China, Communism, Democracy, Hong Kong, Oppression


BeFunky_screenshot day 3 hong kong protests 001.jpg

 

Even though the world is aware of the protests in Hong Kong, thanks to China’s all out censorship of news, radio, social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram along with social media sites approved by the Chinese government such as Weibo and Weixin, aka WeChat, China’s mainlanders remain in the dark.

Stripes

Authorities in Beijing are loath to give mainland citizens any close-up look at Hong Kong’s protests, lest mainlanders get any ideas about organizing their own challenges to what Chinese officials call ‘social stability….’

A search for keywords such as ‘Occupy Central’ in Chinese on Weibo will return a familiar if frustrating message for mainland info-seekers: ‘your results can not be displayed in accordance with relevant laws and regulations’” While users can still search for ‘Hong Kong,’ the results are mostly unrelated to the protest. Human censors deployed by Weibo are constantly deleting relevant content.….

Read full article

 

Can it be that scenes such as the video (below) of an elderly person being peppered sprayed in the face by Hong Kong police would unnerve the people of China?

What are the odds of the Chinese people being moved by a wave of umbrellas, thousands of Hong Kongers standing strong in the rain for democracy move the people of China to taking a stand?

 

Hong Kongers of all ages continue to come out in defiance of Hong Kong and China’s government by refusing to stand down in what has become known as Occupy Central by some and the “Umbrella Revolution” by others.

 

 

 

The following video contains overhead shots from Monday’s (29th) protest in Hong Kong. As you can see and to the disdain of the Chinese government, the crowds continue to grow. How this will end, we do know but one thing is certain. History is in the making.

 

 

Watch as @diana_jou captures the voices from Hong Kong’s #OccupyCentral protests: http://t.co/FUy5qCDzoo

— Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) September 30, 2014

The umbrellas of Hong Kong’s ‘umbrella revolution’ come in handy tonight as the skies open – by @AntAFP @AFPphoto pic.twitter.com/dTMJkyPsZr — Agnès Bun 黃瑩燕 (@AgnesBun) September 30, 2014

Great pic by @xaumeolleros pic.twitter.com/3MJO6eMAtt #HongKong #OccupyCentral #AFP via @AFP

— Agnès Bun 黃瑩燕 (@AgnesBun) September 30, 2014

Scene from the protests in Hong Kong: a policeman sleeps next to a mass transit slogan – by @Alex_Ogle @AFPphoto pic.twitter.com/0VLuBpDtI2 — Agnès Bun 黃瑩燕 (@AgnesBun) September 29, 2014

Clearly the protests are taking its toll on all.

As of 11:27 a.m. EST in the USA, 11:27 p.m. (09/30/2014) Hong Kong:

Harcourt Road at 8.45pm. No police spotted all evening. #HongKong #OccupyCentral pic.twitter.com/7ybMY2OVIf

— Judy Ngao (@Judy_Ngao) September 30, 2014

 

LINKS:
http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/censors-in-china-keep-mainlanders-in-dark-about-hong-kong-protests-1.305616#.VCnPdR6mbOE.twitter
http://chinadigitaltimes.net/

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Gab.ai
  • MeWe
  • Tea Party Community
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • scoop.it
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • More
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Blog Stats

  • 2,627,365 hits

Google Translate

Archives

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,261 other subscribers
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

2016 Cry and Howl Conservative Blog Award

NRA Member

Ammo.com

Veterans’ Tales – A Forum for Veterans & Family Members of Vets

RSS Veterans’ Tales

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Wow!

WowMagazine

RSS Wow! Magazine — Recent Posts

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Blogroll

  • 1389 Blog – Counterjihad!
  • Bare Naked Islam
  • Be Sure You're RIGHT, Then Go Ahead
  • Boudica BPI Weblog
  • Cry and Howl
  • Fix Bayonets!
  • FREE NORTH CAROLINA
  • GRUMPY OPINIONS
  • Ike Jakson’s Blog
  • Legal Insurrection
  • LUPUS AND CHRONIC ILLNESS
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Old West Tales (Thoughts from Afar)
  • Pacific Paratrooper
  • PAJAMAS MEDIA
  • Political Clown Parade
  • Publius-Huldah’s Blog
  • Rifleman III Journal
  • The Acceptable Digest
  • The Christian Gazette
  • The Daily Rant
  • The Last Tradition
  • The Mad Jewess
  • The Religion of Peace

Ephesians 6:13

Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm.

Minds.com

Gab.ai – #SpeakFreely – Join Me

@PUMABydesign

Grumpy Opinions Conservative News and Opinions 2016

Grumpy Opinions Conservative News and Opinions 2016

Tweets

My Tweets

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work by PUMABydesign001's Blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://pumabydesign001.com/fair-use-notice/.

CREEPING SHARIA

SAY NO TO ONLINE CENSORSHIP

RSS Front Page Magazine

  • Judge in Trump Case was Recommended by Schumer to Obama
  • Ushering In the Exciting World Where Biden Gets Indicted by a Local Prosecutor
  • State Dept’s Special Representative for Critical Race Theory Meets With Guru of Anti-Racism
  • Soros DA Proposes to Support Asians By Not Locking Up Their Killers
  • U.S. Marshals Were Banned From Arresting Leftist Supreme Court Protesters
©2017 PUMABydesign001’s Blog.

RSS Lifezette

  • Rude diner complains about special needs worker so pizza shop hangs the perfect sign
  • Carrie Underwood Moved From a Lavish Mansion to a Farm to Live With Her Family, Breed Horses, and Grow Her Own Food
  • An Inconvenient Truth! Tucker Shreds January 6 Lies, Has The Receipts | Ep 527
  • Trump’s Message Needs To Focus On These Things | Biden Has Spent 40% of Term Away From WH | Ep 526
  • The Real Joe Biden, the Fake Pandemic and the Devastating Consequences

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Follow Following
    • PUMABydesign001's Blog
    • Join 474 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PUMABydesign001's Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: